Warming perioperative multilayer blanket assessment

Burnell, Simon

doi:10.1186/isrctn34213075

http://isrctn.com/ 2017

DOI: 10.1186/isrctn34213075

|View full text |Cite

Warming perioperative multilayer blanket assessment

Simon Burnell¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2017

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap

Husen¹,

Wilde²,

Waard³

et al. 2017

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Researchers are increasingly required to make research data publicly available in data repositories. Although several organisations propose criteria to recommend and evaluate the quality of data repositories, there is no consensus of what constitutes a good data repository. In this paper, we investigate, first, which data repositories are recommended by various stakeholders (publishers, funders, and community organizations) and second, which repositories are certified by a number of organisations. We then compare these two lists of repositories, and the criteria for recommendation and certification. We find that criteria used by organisations recommending and certifying repositories are similar, although the certification criteria are generally more detailed. We distil the lists of criteria into seven main categories: "Mission", "Community/ Recognition", "Legal and Contractual Compliance", "Access/Accessibility", "Technical Structure/ Interface", "Retrievability" and "Preservation". Although the criteria are similar, the lists of repositories that are recommended by the various agencies are very different. Out of all of the recommended repositories, less than 6% obtained certification. As certification is becoming more important, steps should be taken to decrease this gap between recommended and certified repositories, and ensure that certification standards become applicable, and applied, to the repositories which researchers are currently using.

show abstract

Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap

Husen¹,

Wilde²,

Waard³

et al. 2017

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Warming perioperative multilayer blanket assessment

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap

Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About