1996
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WARNING! Sign and Label Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research may investigate this relationship in more detail. The positive effect of the provision of the WHO explanation about the relationship between air pollution and health agrees with the literature on warning labels [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Future research may investigate this relationship in more detail. The positive effect of the provision of the WHO explanation about the relationship between air pollution and health agrees with the literature on warning labels [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Before any label or warning can communicate its message effectively, its receiver should be aware of it (Stewart & Martin, 1994;Wogalter & Laughery, 1996). Whereas most studies measured participants' recall or recognition of the disclosure as an indicator of their awareness of the disclosure, one study (Boerman, van Reijmersdal, & Neijens, 2015a) measured participants' visual attention through eye tracking to tap into participants' disclosure awareness.…”
Section: Disclosure Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulated gambling games allow players to compete against professionals, offer a wide variety of game play modes, in-game narration similar to that featured on televised poker tournaments, as well as providing in-depth tutorials designed to assist players in "improving" their game. These games increase player familiarity with gambling which may result in problem gambling behaviour given that increased familiarity with activities and products has been shown to reduce the level of hazard perceived, the likelihood of individuals warnings not being read, and can lead to an overconfidence in individual abilities (Wogalter & Laughery, 1996). Furthermore, these games may promote illusions of control, irrational beliefs that individuals have the skill necessary to beat the odds, and that winning is easy and only one game away.…”
Section: Promotion Of Gambling To Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%