Was it me when it happened too early? Experience of delayed effects shapes sense of agency

Haering, Carola; Kiesel, Andrea

doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.012

Cited by 45 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, we replicated, under very different conditions, the learning effect described by Matute et al [24], showing also that the effect appears to be unaffected by the order of presentation. However, these results do not replicate the order effect shown by Haering et al [33]. In the General Discussion, we will put forward some factors that could account for this discrepancy.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 52%

“…We also found that the order in which the trials are presented did not seem to impact this learning effect in the delayed condition, as it occurred both in the ID and the DI groups. However, Haering et al [33] have shown that prior experience with a certain delay could affect the judgments on subsequent trials with different delays.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the temporal binding literature, trial order effects have been, to the best of our knowledge, scarcely studied. For example, Haering et al [33] (see also [34]) trained their participants with an action-effect delay of 0 ms in the immediate group, or 250 ms in the delayed group, during the first phase of their experiment. Then, during a second phase, Methodological factors in temporal binding 11 this initial training was found to induce differences in the sense of agency about the effects that followed the action with different delays (0, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ms).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Haering et al [33] divided their experiment into two different phases. In the first phase they presented only the delayed or the immediate trials, depending on the group.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, Matute et al [24] conducted their experiments with the clock methodology but they presented the two types of trials in an intermixed manner. Thus, the aim of Experiment 2 was to explore whether the results of Haering et al [33] would generalize to Libet᾽s clock s clock experiments, using Labclock Web. That is, we aimed to test whether the experiencing the action that causes the effect immediately or after a given time interval has an impact on subsequent trials where the outcome is delayed or immediate.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Methodological factors involved in the study of temporal binding using the Open Source Software Labclock Web

Cubillas¹

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temporal binding occurs when an action and an outcome that follows it after a short period of time are judged as occurring closer to each other in time than they actually are. This effect has often been studied using Libet᾽s clock methodology. Garaizar et al.[1] presented Labclock Web, an HTML5 and open source software that allows researchers to conduct temporal binding and other experiments using Libet᾽s clock through the Internet. The purpose of the three experiments presented here was to test how certain methodological modifications in the Labclock Web task could impact the temporal binding effect. In comparison with the original study, we aimed to: (a) reduce the interval between action and outcome in the delayed condition to 100 ms, instead of 500, (b) present the two types of trials, immediate and delayed, in two separate consecutive blocks, instead of intermixed, (c) use a visual, rather than auditory, outcome following the action, and (d) reduce the number of trials. In addition to its potential theoretical implications, the results confirm that Labclock Web is a useful and reliable tool for conducting temporal binding experiments and that it is well suited to produce temporal binding in a broad range of situations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 52%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Haering et al [33] divided their experiment into two different phases. In the first phase they presented only the delayed or the immediate trials, depending on the group.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Methodological factors involved in the study of temporal binding using the Open Source Software Labclock Web

Cubillas¹

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements

Schmitter,

Kufer,

Steinsträter

et al. 2023

Human Brain Mapping

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When we perform an action, its sensory outcomes usually follow shortly after. This characteristic temporal relationship aids in distinguishing self‐ from externally generated sensory input. To preserve this ability under dynamically changing environmental conditions, our expectation of the timing between action and outcome must be able to recalibrate, for example, when the outcome is consistently delayed. Until now, it remains unclear whether this process, known as sensorimotor temporal recalibration, can be specifically attributed to recalibration of sensorimotor (action‐outcome) predictions, or whether it may be partly due to the recalibration of expectations about the intersensory (e.g., audio‐tactile) timing. Therefore, we investigated the behavioral and neural correlates of temporal recalibration and differences in sensorimotor and intersensory contexts. During fMRI, subjects were exposed to delayed or undelayed tones elicited by actively or passively generated button presses. While recalibration of the expected intersensory timing (i.e., between the tactile sensation during the button movement and the tones) can be expected to occur during both active and passive movements, recalibration of sensorimotor predictions should be limited to active movement conditions. Effects of this procedure on auditory temporal perception and the modality‐transfer to visual perception were tested in a delay detection task. Across both contexts, we found recalibration to be associated with activations in hippocampus and cerebellum. Context‐dependent differences emerged in terms of stronger behavioral recalibration effects in sensorimotor conditions and were captured by differential activation pattern in frontal cortices, cerebellum, and sensory processing regions. These findings highlight the role of the hippocampus in encoding and retrieving newly acquired temporal stimulus associations during temporal recalibration. Furthermore, recalibration‐related activations in the cerebellum may reflect the retention of multiple representations of temporal stimulus associations across both contexts. Finally, we showed that sensorimotor predictions modulate recalibration‐related processes in frontal, cerebellar, and sensory regions, which potentially account for the perceptual advantage of sensorimotor versus intersensory temporal recalibration.

show abstract

Robotic interfaces for cognitive psychology and embodiment research: A research roadmap

Beckerle

Castellini

Lenggenhager

2018

WIRES Cognitive Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advanced human–machine interfaces render robotic devices applicable to study and enhance human cognition. This turns robots into formidable neuroscientific tools to study processes such as the adaptation between a human operator and the operated robotic device and how this adaptation modulates human embodiment and embodied cognition. We analyze bidirectional human–machine interface (bHMI) technologies for transparent information transfer between a human and a robot via efferent and afferent channels. Even if such interfaces have a tremendous positive impact on feedback loops and embodiment, advanced bHMIs face immense technological challenges. We critically discuss existing technical approaches, mainly focusing on haptics, and suggest extensions thereof, which include other aspects of touch. Moreover, we point out other potential constraints such as limited functionality, semi‐autonomy, intent‐detection, and feedback methods. From this, we develop a research roadmap to guide understanding and development of bidirectional human–machine interfaces that enable robotic experiments to empirically study the human mind and embodiment. We conclude the integration of dexterous control and multisensory feedback to be a promising roadmap towards future robotic interfaces, especially regarding applications in the cognitive sciences. This article is categorized under: Computer Science > Robotics Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Neuroscience > Plasticity

show abstract

Was it me when it happened too early? Experience of delayed effects shapes sense of agency

Cited by 45 publications

References 20 publications

Methodological factors involved in the study of temporal binding using the Open Source Software Labclock Web

Methodological factors involved in the study of temporal binding using the Open Source Software Labclock Web

Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements

Robotic interfaces for cognitive psychology and embodiment research: A research roadmap

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About