2017 IEEE 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cloud.2017.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WASP: Workload Adaptive Energy-Latency Optimization in Server Farms Using Server Low-Power States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common host-level power saving technique, DVFS, can lower the power consumption by running workloads more slowly. DVFS policies and mechanisms have become more sophisticated over time, starting from power throttling of a chip multi-processor [21], to finer-grain per-core management [37,39], to workload-and request-aware throttling decisions [9,10,20,23,31,45,46]. Newer approaches that can work in high-utilization environments generally require visibility into application-exported metrics.…”
Section: Why Consider Applications As Opaque Boxes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One common host-level power saving technique, DVFS, can lower the power consumption by running workloads more slowly. DVFS policies and mechanisms have become more sophisticated over time, starting from power throttling of a chip multi-processor [21], to finer-grain per-core management [37,39], to workload-and request-aware throttling decisions [9,10,20,23,31,45,46]. Newer approaches that can work in high-utilization environments generally require visibility into application-exported metrics.…”
Section: Why Consider Applications As Opaque Boxes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kanev et al [19] bring power management to the data center era by examining the effect of c-states and DVFS on the performance and power consumption of cloud workloads. CARB [46], WASP [45], and DynSleep [10] achieve power savings through deep sleep c-states while retaining tail latency constraints. Pegasus [23] adjusts voltage and frequency at regular intervals in response to changes in the application-reported latency.…”
Section: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right-sizing the energy budgets of compute and cooling, while maintaining the Quality of Service (QoS) requirements in data centers, is a challenging problem [20]. Prior works, that optimize system energy under QoS constraints of workloads, typically consolidate the workload onto the fewest number of servers so that other servers can remain in sleep (inactive) states [7,9,10,19]. While such a strategy is effective to reduce CPU power, it can inadvertently raise the thermal profile of active servers, resulting in increased power consumption of its fans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce energy consumption of servers in data centers, prior works have proposed the use of low power states [7,10]. However, higher job latency can be caused by placing servers into low power states, resulting in the failure to meet the Quality of Service (QoS) requirements [19]. Job service latency can be high due to (1) queuing effects -for example, this will happen if there are not enough servers to handle a burst of arriving jobs; (2) having to wake up from low power states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation