The assumption that hydrogen and oxygen of plant biomass originate almost exclusively from water absorbed by roots (Farquhar et al., 1998; Roden et al., 2000; McElrone et al., 2013), has long been taken for granted in plant sciences. However, recent studies have also identified foliar water uptake as a significant but still unquantified net water source for terrestrial plants (Eller et al., 2013; Goldsmith et al., 2013; Dawson & Goldsmith, 2018; Berry et al., 2019; Schreel & Steppe, 2020). The growing interest in the development of a new model that includes foliar water uptake to explain hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in leaf water and tree rings requires a method for distinguishing between these two water sources. I therefore devised a method utilizing two different heavy waters (HDO and H218O) to simultaneously label both foliar-uptake water and root-uptake water and quantify their relative contributions to plant biomass. Using this new method, I here present evidence that, in the case of well-watered Cryptomeria japonica, hydrogen and oxygen incorporated into new leaf cellulose in the rainy season derives mostly from foliar-uptake water, while that of new root cellulose derives mostly from root-uptake water, and new branch xylem is somewhere in between. Abandoning the assumption that these elements are supplied from soil water alone may have vast implications in fields ranging from isotope dendroclimatology, silviculture, to biogeochemistry.