2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water assemblages in hydrosocial territories: Connecting place, space, and time through the cultural-material signification of water in coastal Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, in focusing on the role of human actors in socio-material bricolage, we have also highlighted the way the strategic relationality of infrastructuralinstitutional entanglements directs their actions. Farmers, water guards, and municipal actors reacted to technological changes by trying to (re)shape both infrastructures and institutions according to their own contextually bound worldviews and interests, but also in relation to wider socio-natural relations and how meaning is given to these relations and their transformation (see Hoogesteger et al, 2023b;and Reyes-Escate et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion: Aggregation Alteration And Articu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, in focusing on the role of human actors in socio-material bricolage, we have also highlighted the way the strategic relationality of infrastructuralinstitutional entanglements directs their actions. Farmers, water guards, and municipal actors reacted to technological changes by trying to (re)shape both infrastructures and institutions according to their own contextually bound worldviews and interests, but also in relation to wider socio-natural relations and how meaning is given to these relations and their transformation (see Hoogesteger et al, 2023b;and Reyes-Escate et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion: Aggregation Alteration And Articu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other studies (see, for instance, Dwiartama & Rosin, 2014) point at the realization that technological systems such as irrigation systems are neither social, material, or symbolic only, but 'all at once' (Boelens, 2014;Reyes Escate et al, 2022). However, through which mechanisms these different elements influence and relate to each other is often analytically not clear.…”
Section: Introducing 'The Material' Into Institutional Bricolagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The recognition of different ontologies allows us to recognize that there are multiple ways of knowing, understanding, and acting on the world we live in. This recognition gives room to concepts, ideas, knowledges and realities "that commonly are thought to be unproblematic and univocal" (Reyes Escate et al, 2022), creating 'openings' (De la Cadena, 2017 for 'human-nonhuman networked realities', such as irrigation, production, institutions and technology, to be more and/or different from what they already are in the mainstream/dominant sense. From this perspective imaginaries, which represent a specific way of knowing and understanding the world and how in it social and natural elements tie together as -and through-relations, are plural and dynamic (Hoogesteger et al, 2016;Yates et al, 2017).…”
Section: Imaginaries As Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assemblages enables us to look at objects and people in their mutual relations and constitution (Bennett, 2010). Looking at the water assemblages through tinkering enables us to understand water use across time and its implications in today's new Caledonian water governance (Kemerink-Seyoum et al, 2019a;Reyes Escate et al, 2022).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Tinkeringmentioning
confidence: 99%