2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water availability drives fine root dynamics in a Eucalyptus woodland under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration

Abstract: Fine roots are a key component of carbon and nutrient dynamics in forest ecosystems. Rising atmospheric [CO2] (eCO2) is likely to alter the production and activity of fine roots, with important consequences for forest carbon storage. Yet empirical evidence of the role of eCO2 in driving root dynamics is limited, particularly for grassy woodlands, an ecosystem type of global importance. We sampled fine roots across seasons over a 2‐year period to examine the effects of eCO2 on their biomass, production, turnove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the extra C assimilated under eCO 2 is rapidly respired without changing soil C dynamics . This is supported by the lack of changes in root biomass observed by Piñeiro et al (2020) and our observation of the lack of impacts of eCO 2 on mycorrhizal fungi biomass. Changes in microbial community composition and enhancements of C losses and mycorrhizal biomass with eCO 2 have been found to be seasonal and substrate-dependent (Castañeda-Gómez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It has been proposed that the extra C assimilated under eCO 2 is rapidly respired without changing soil C dynamics . This is supported by the lack of changes in root biomass observed by Piñeiro et al (2020) and our observation of the lack of impacts of eCO 2 on mycorrhizal fungi biomass. Changes in microbial community composition and enhancements of C losses and mycorrhizal biomass with eCO 2 have been found to be seasonal and substrate-dependent (Castañeda-Gómez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast (H1b), we expect stronger positive effects of P addition than of water addition under eCO 2 due to the particularly strong P-limitation of these soils (Crous et al 2015). We also predict that (H2) eCO 2 will increase fine root production and rhizosphere enzyme activity under low P and water supply conditions as a functional response to greater nutrient demand (Piñeiro et al 2020), but not under high levels of these resources. Finally, we hypothesize that (H3) eCO 2 will lead to a greater net CO 2 uptake rate (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…During the first two weeks of the experiment, all pots were watered to gravimetric soil moisture contents (gSMC) of 21% (i.e., ∽90% of soil water holding capacity) to ensure homogeneous seed germination across water treatments, after which pots were held at treatment targets for soil water content (12% and 20%). The lower moisture level used in our experimental set up (∽60% WHC) serves as reference as it falls within the range for the experimental site during the growing season (Piñeiro et al 2020). Our higher moisture level (∽90% WHC) was selected to provide enough contrast with reference soil moisture levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root litter decomposition can thus be an important source of nutrient release at depth. Further, eCO2 has been found to increase the rate of root turnover in this system (Piñeiro et al, 2020), which is one of the main sources of C supply to the deeper soil, other than increased root exudation.…”
Section: Elevated Co2 and Depth Dependency Of Rhizosphere Effectsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Though enzyme activities decrease with depth, they are more abundant per unit soil C deeper in the profile. Given the rather low eCO2 fertilisation effect found on photosynthetic rate (Ellsworth et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2020) and root production in this system (Piñeiro et al, 2020) the presumed limited increase in C release belowground is likely turned over without affecting the SOM decomposition. Mineral adsorbed P forms however, are sensitive to root derived changes in pH (Jones and Darrah, 1994), representing a different mechanism for affecting the P cycle separate from SOM decomposition.…”
Section: Elevated Co2 and Depth Dependency Of Rhizosphere Effectsmentioning
confidence: 85%