2011
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water‐Based Hydrogen‐Atom Wires as Mediators in Long‐Range Proton‐Coupled Electron Transfer in Enzymes: A New Twist on Water Reactivity

Abstract: Water is a conducting ligand between metal complexes! Water mediates the long‐range proton‐coupled electron transfer between two Cu complexes separated by 11 Å in the peptidylglycine α‐hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM) cofactor (see scheme). The proposed mechanism, which involves three H‐atom exchanges, accounts for long‐range electron transfer in metalloenzymes, and may be ubiquitous in nature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A third suggestion from Klinman and coworkers (27) proposed that the electron could transfer across the intersite cavity, perhaps assisted by Y79 provided the solvent was ordered . This latter mechanism has also been tested in silico where a pathway composed of a chain of three H-bonded water molecules was calculated to have sufficiently low activation energy for rapid proton-coupled ET provided that the CuM-site acceptor was the Cu-O• (cupryl) species (61). A mechanism involving interdomain motion has also been suggested (39), but deemed unlikely on the grounds that the interdomain distance does not change in any of the crystal structures published to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A third suggestion from Klinman and coworkers (27) proposed that the electron could transfer across the intersite cavity, perhaps assisted by Y79 provided the solvent was ordered . This latter mechanism has also been tested in silico where a pathway composed of a chain of three H-bonded water molecules was calculated to have sufficiently low activation energy for rapid proton-coupled ET provided that the CuM-site acceptor was the Cu-O• (cupryl) species (61). A mechanism involving interdomain motion has also been suggested (39), but deemed unlikely on the grounds that the interdomain distance does not change in any of the crystal structures published to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative pathway via His172 and the nearby Y79 which π-stacks against the histidine ring has been evaluated both experimentally (27, 41) and computationally (61). In this pathway, the tyrosine is about 7 Å from the CuM center, and could operate as a facile ET pathway provided the intervening solvent is ordered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly the copper centers are 11 Å apart separated by a solvent-filled cleft in the protein which imposes restrictions on intra-site electron transfer (7-10). It has been proposed that the physical separation prevents the second electron from being transferred until after the enzyme has committed to catalysis, thereby harnessing the strong electrophilic reactivity of the Cu(II)-superoxo entity (11, 12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, crystallographic analysis reveals a structural interaction between the M and H sites, with the M314I inducing dissociation of the H107 ligand from the H-center, some 11 Å distant (6). H172 forms a stacking interaction with the conserved Y79 residue, and it has been suggested from studies on the related enzyme TBM (30), that the H172 ligand might form the exit pathway for the electron as it transfers from H to M using Y79 and oriented water molecules as additional elements of the ET pathway (31). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%