Water-Channel Study of Flow and Turbulence Past a Two-Dimensional Array of Obstacles

Abstract

A neutral boundary layer was generated in the laboratory to analyze the mean\ud velocity field and the turbulence field within and above an array of two‐dimensional obstacles\ud simulating an urban canopy. Different geometrical configurations were considered in order to\ud investigate the main characteristics of the flow as a function of the aspect ratio (AR) of the canopy.\ud To this end, a summary of the two‐dimensional fields of the fundamental turbulence parameters is\ud given for AR ranging from 1 to 2. The results show that the flow field depends strongly on AR only\ud within the canyon, while the outer flow seems to be less sensitive to this parameter. This is not\ud true for the vertical momentum flux, which is one of the parameters most affected by AR, both\ud within and outside the canyon. The experiments also indicate that, when (i.e. the\ud skimming flow regime), the roughness sub‐layer extends up to a height equal to 1.25 times the\ud height of the obstacles (H), surmounted by an inertial sub‐layer that extends up to 2.7 H. In\ud contrast, for (i.e. the wake‐interference regime) the inertial sub‐layer is not present.\ud This has significant implications when using similarity laws for deriving wind and turbulence\ud profiles in canopy flows. Furthermore, two estimations of the viscous dissipation rate of turbulent\ud kinetic energy of the flow are given. The first one is based on the fluctuating strain rate tensor,\ud while the second is related to the mean strain rate tensor. It is shown that the two expressions\ud give similar results, but the former is more complicated, suggesting that the latter might be used\ud in numerical models with a certain degree of reliability. Finally, the data presented can also be\ud used as a dataset for the validation of numerical models

Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation of Multiple Large Eddy Simulation Aspects for Pollutant Dispersion in Street Canyons Using OpenFOAM

“…Wind tunnel studies by Snyder [89] set the critical Re number at 11,000, based on the reference velocity of the free stream and building height. Later experiments either followed the aforementioned critical number [90], or directed to larger Re numbers, e.g., 19,000 [17], 37,000 [91], 44,000 [92], and 56,000 [3]. Recently Cui et al [93] reviewed the latest Re values reported in the literature and available CFD simulations with regard to the critical Re number, proposing a critical value of 32,000.…”

Assessing the urban heat island and its energy impact on residential buildings in Mediterranean climate: Barcelona case study

“…The breeze flow is quite decreased in the urban area at roof level, but it is definitely absent at street level, since the density of the buildings and the canyon geometry (H/W > 1) determines a skimming flow regime [36], characterized by stable circulatory vortices and very weak or absent interaction with the overlying atmosphere [60][61][62]. In effect, the temperature at street level reaches its maximum between 12:00 and 16:00 LST, while at roof level it remains roughly constant.…”

CFD Analysis of Urban Canopy Flows Employing the V2F Model: Impact of Different Aspect Ratios and Relative Heights

“…e ow rate is set by a oodgate placed at the closing section of the channel, and the water depth, h 0.16 m, is maintained constant throughout the experiments (more information about the facility can be found in [42]). e reference frame has been de ned with the x-axis aligned with the streamwise velocity and the z-axis vertical.…”