Water Policies and Conflict Resolution of Public Participation Decision-Making Processes Using Prioritized Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) Operators

Abstract

There is a growing interest in environmental policies about how to implement public participation engagement in the context of water resources management. This paper presents a robust methodology, based on ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators, to conflict resolution decision-making problems under uncertain environments due to both information and stakeholders' preferences. The methodology allows integrating heterogeneous interests of the general public and stakeholders on account of their different degree of acceptance or preference and level of influence or power regarding the measures and policies to be adopted, and also of their level of involvement (i.e., information supply, consultation and active involvement). These considerations lead to different environmental and socioeconomic outcomes, and levels of stakeholders' satisfaction. The methodology establishes a prioritization relationship over the stakeholders. The individual stakeholders' preferences are aggregated through their associated weights, which depend on the satisfaction of the higher priority decision maker. The methodology ranks the optimal management strategies to maximize the stakeholders' satisfaction. It has been successfully applied to a real case study, providing greater fairness, transparency, social equity and consensus among actors. Furthermore, it provides support to environmental policies, such as the EU Water Framework Directive(WFD), improving integrated water management while covering a wide range of objectives, management alternatives and stakeholders.

A Statistical Tool to Generate Potential Future Climate Scenarios for Hydrology Applications

“…Furthermore, the local scenarios of CC generated by using the GROUNDS tool have been propagated to different variables in different case studies: recharge [16,26], ground subsidence [47], and snow cover area [48]. e tool has been proven to be effective for hydrological applications and could contribute to the analyses to support decision-making processes by experts or public participation [49,50].…”

An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains

“…The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator developed by Yager [ 49 ] is important in most aggregation techniques and has been analyzed, applied and generalized by a number of researchers [ 38 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. The most distinctive advantage of the OWA operator is its ordering mechanism for the argument under consideration, which enables the integration of the complex attitudinal character of the experts in the decision-making process.…”

Decision-Maker-Oriented VS. Collaboration: China’s Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making

“…On the one hand, the public participation in the decision-making process of resource development and utilization has been studied. Public participation in water resource management and the formulation of fishing policies has often been discussed [38][39][40][41]. The method of analytic hierarchy process used to incorporate stakeholders' preferences in the decision-making of regional forest planning in Australia could considerably enhance the transparency of the participatory process and public acceptance of policy decisions [42].…”