2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/6/126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WATER PRODUCTION IN COMETS C/2011 L4 (PanSTARRS) AND C/2012 F6 (LEMMON) FROM OBSERVATIONS WITHSOHO/SWAN

Abstract: The maximum water production rates were ∼1 × 10 30 molecules s −1 for both comets. The activities of both comets were asymmetric about perihelion. C/2011 L4 (PanSTARRS) was more active before perihelion than after, but C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) was more active after perihelion than before.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives Q(H 2 O) = 1.39 ± 0.26 × 10 29 mol/s for February 7 and Q(H 2 O) = 0.79 ± 0.19 × 10 29 mol/s for June 5. Our production rates are lower than those obtained by Paganini et al (2014) and Combi et al (2014). When comparing the water production rates in comets computed from different sources there is usually a discrepancy between the values computed from observations of H, OH, or H 2 O directly at different wavelengths.…”
Section: Compositioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This gives Q(H 2 O) = 1.39 ± 0.26 × 10 29 mol/s for February 7 and Q(H 2 O) = 0.79 ± 0.19 × 10 29 mol/s for June 5. Our production rates are lower than those obtained by Paganini et al (2014) and Combi et al (2014). When comparing the water production rates in comets computed from different sources there is usually a discrepancy between the values computed from observations of H, OH, or H 2 O directly at different wavelengths.…”
Section: Compositioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…(b) For comet Lemmon, Combi et al (2014) provide Q H 2 O values in the range 7−12 × 10 29 molec s −1 during this period. Contemporaneous SWAN measurements are slightly lower than quoted here, but they were not time-deconvolved and the average values measured by SWAN a few days later are within 10% of those given here.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For other periods and for comet Lemmon, the observations of the OH radical could not be used to derive an accurate water production rate owing to significant uncertainties in the quenching of the maser inversion. We either used the water production rates reported elsewhere (Combi et al 2014;Paganini et al 2014) or made an interpolation from the Odin observations of comet Lovejoy at perihelion. Based on Nançay and Odin observations, we adopt a mean Q H 2 O = 5, 5.5, 6, and 7 × 10 29 molec s −1 for the 13−16 January, 13-25 January, 23−25 January, and 26 January-3 February 2015 time intervals, respectively, with a ±20% time variation possible within each time interval.…”
Section: Reference Water Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comets Lemmon and Lovejoy became unexpectedly bright naked-eye comets, reaching visual magnitudes of 4.5 and 4.8, and displayed high water production rates near perihelion of 1×10 30 and 1.5×10 29 molec. s −1 (Combi et al 2014;Crovisier et al, priv. comm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%