2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Quality Prediction Model Combining Sparse Auto-encoder and LSTM Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steep increase in error gap between the short-term and long-term DO content forecasting performance of our proposed hybrid model indicates that the nearer the forecast future the higher the forecast accuracy and vice versa. Table 2, the performance of the proposed hybrid EEMD-based LSTM NN is compared with another related hybrid water quality prediction model based on Sparse Auto-encoder (SAE) and LSTM NN, SAE-BPNN, single LSTM and BPNN developed by Li et al [28]. The tabulated error statistics indicate that our proposed hybrid model outperform the other models listed in Table II in terms of the error margin of the forecasted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The steep increase in error gap between the short-term and long-term DO content forecasting performance of our proposed hybrid model indicates that the nearer the forecast future the higher the forecast accuracy and vice versa. Table 2, the performance of the proposed hybrid EEMD-based LSTM NN is compared with another related hybrid water quality prediction model based on Sparse Auto-encoder (SAE) and LSTM NN, SAE-BPNN, single LSTM and BPNN developed by Li et al [28]. The tabulated error statistics indicate that our proposed hybrid model outperform the other models listed in Table II in terms of the error margin of the forecasted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, the proposed hybrid multi-scale forecasting model can get more features through the decomposition process for the forecasted signals, which further results in improved forecasting accuracy. Amongst the models proposed in [28], the hybrid SAE-LSTM model demonstrated the least error in terms of prediction accuracy. However, the tabulated error statistics in Table II indicate that our Hybrid EEMD-based LSTM outperforms the SAE-LSTM model due to the potentials of the applied EEMD method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, observation of higher frequency data and proper pretreatment of the massive data (e.g., interpolation) to minimize internal error or missing points of data are essential for improving the practicability of the advanced data analysis technologies. Recently, real-time data measured with in situ sensors is increasingly used for the analyses and prediction of water quality; however, the information on the sensor types, measuring parameters, and their frequency of the measurement has not been clearly reported [17,135,142]. Normally, high-frequency real-time data includes errors (e.g., missing data or abnormal values) and thus require a proper pretreatment (e.g., consideration of missing data or removal of data errors) to obtain a reliable model performance [142,151].…”
Section: Future Of Ict Research For Water Quality Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general function of real-time online water quality monitoring systems is to conduct data acquisition, transmission, and interpretation of the measured data [2]. The advanced data analysis technologies, such as machine learning, also provide valuable tools for effective water quality data management (e.g., prediction of water quality changes) [16][17][18]. Recently, deep-learning, a type of machine learning method, is increasingly used for the analysis of massive environmental data, to provide useful information for water quality management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%