2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2830706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waterlike hierarchy of anomalies in a continuous spherical shouldered potential

Abstract: We investigate by molecular dynamics simulations a continuous isotropic core-softened potential with attractive well in three dimensions, introduced by Franzese [J. Mol. Liq. 136, 267 (2007)], that displays liquid-liquid coexistence with a critical point and waterlike density anomaly. Besides the thermodynamic anomalies, here we find diffusion and structural anomalies. The anomalies, not observed in the discrete version of this model, occur with the same hierarchy that characterizes water. We discuss the diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
144
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(141 reference statements)
15
144
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme is based on the assumption that water-water interaction is characterized by an isotropic component, a directional component, and a cooperative component and that H-bond formation leads to an open local structure. Alternative mechanisms, based only on isotropic interactions (45)(46)(47)(48)(49) or only on directional interactions (50) have been considered and their relevance for the water case is an open question. Finally, estimates for the three components of the H-bond interaction, based on experimental data lead to the conclusion that the LLCP scenario with a positive critical pressure holds for water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme is based on the assumption that water-water interaction is characterized by an isotropic component, a directional component, and a cooperative component and that H-bond formation leads to an open local structure. Alternative mechanisms, based only on isotropic interactions (45)(46)(47)(48)(49) or only on directional interactions (50) have been considered and their relevance for the water case is an open question. Finally, estimates for the three components of the H-bond interaction, based on experimental data lead to the conclusion that the LLCP scenario with a positive critical pressure holds for water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were also supported by simulations both in atomistic 13,14 and in effective models. [15][16][17][18] The addition of a solute might change the position or even the existence of the anomalies in the pressure-temperature phase diagram of these model systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is accepted that the presence of two accessible length scales in the potential allow for the system to have two liquid phases and a density anomaly. The accessibility is the ingredient that explains why a density anomaly derived in 1D does not necessarily hold at higher dimensions and why a density anomaly derived for a smooth potential might be lost if the slope linking the two length scales becomes infinite [20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is accepted that the presence of two accessible length scales in the potential allow for the system to have two liquid phases and a density anomaly. The accessibility is the ingredient that explains why a density anomaly derived in 1D does not necessarily hold at higher dimensions and why a density anomaly derived for a smooth potential might be lost if the slope linking the two length scales becomes infinite [20][21][22] .In this letter we show, by means of an exactly solvable 1D model and numerical simulations of a similar 3D potential, that a three length scales potential might exhibit three critical points and two density anomalous regions if the different length scales would be accessible. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that core softened potentials are shown to have three critical points and two temperature of maximum density lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%