1993
DOI: 10.2208/prooe.9.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Height and Overtopping rate in Relation to the Risk of Falling on Promenade Breakwaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the data by Takahashi et al . [] were measured testing small subjects and, accordingly, low ( U,h ) values. The experimental points by Karvonen et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the data by Takahashi et al . [] were measured testing small subjects and, accordingly, low ( U,h ) values. The experimental points by Karvonen et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experimental investigations in controlled conditions [ Foster and Cox , ; Abt et al ., ; Takahashi et al ., ; Karvonen et al ., ; Yee , ; Jonkman and Penning‐Rowsell , ; Russo et al ., ; Martínez‐Gomariz et al ., ] explored the stability of individuals in flumes or real channels, by measuring the limiting flow depth h and velocity U that allow individuals to maintain control of their position. Complex experimental apparatus and safety equipment are required to test a wide range of flow depths and velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical part is mainly carried out through mechanical analysis, which analyzes the forces that the human body may be subjected to in the water one by one, and then the corresponding expressions of the relationship between the flow rate and the depth of the water can be deduced [21,22,25]. Experiments include model experiments and real human body experiments-model experiments have some use of concrete or marble board instead of the real human body, or the use of an equal proportion of the reduced human body model instead of the real human body [19][20][21][22][23][28][29][30][31][32]; in the water, it is washed down or washed away to determine the current conditions for the human body's wading limit, and then corrected according to the model of the ratio scale of the flow rate and depth of the water to get the final human body wading limit. The real experiment for the stability of pedestrians in the flood judgment criteria is mainly obtained through the water impact on standing human body when people in a standing position are washed down or feel that the water flow on the human body is a clear threat, making it possible to judge the depth of water and the flow rate of the human body's wading limit.…”
Section: Existing Human Stability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests conducted by Abt, Wittier, Taylor, and Love (1989) demonstrated the importance of the toppling mechanism. Further studies with both adults and children have been undertaken by several authors (Jonkman & Penning‐Rowsell, 2008; Karvonen, Hepojoki, Huhta, & Louhio, 2000; Takahashi, Endoh, & Muro, 1992), all of which considered different clothing features and levels of expertise of the people, as well as different environmental conditions. The results from these experiments provided the basis for the development of an inversely proportional relationship between the mean flow velocity and water depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%