Wave-induced response of seabed: Various formulations and their applicability

Three-dimensional numerical model for wave-induced seabed response around mono-pile

“…Following their study, the effect of inertia force on wave-induced soil response was investigated using linear and non-linear wave theories (Jeng et al 1999;Jeng and Cha 2003). Recently, Ulker et al (2009) further extended the above analytical solutions under plane strain condition using three formulations (QS, PD, FD), and clarified the applicable range of each approximation. Though these analytical approaches demonstrated some features of the soil response to wave actions, they have not considered the effect of the structures under complex conditions in this process.…”

A numerical hydro-geotechnical model for marine gravity structures

“…This simple relation was examined against the system proposed by Ülker and Rahman [23], Ülker et al [24]. It was found to be valid only for a specific range of P 1 that depends on the problem characteristics.…”

“…In a similar approach as in Zienkiewicz et al [22], several studies focused on the applicability of different formulations of the governing equations for modelling seabed response (as a porous medium) to water waves [23,24], The complete formulation was referred to as fully dynamic (FD), the u-p formulation as partially dynamic (PD) and Biot's original formulation as quasi-static (QS). The equation sets were solved analytically, without any structure present, to form generalised analytical models for seabed response to water waves under plane strain conditions.…”

Recovery-based error estimation in the dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations

“…Based on normalizing the results based on p 0 , the value of that is considered as unit (for more details refer to [56] and [58]). Graphs of non-dimensionalized stresses and pore pressure against thickness as obtained from FEM are given in Fig.…”