SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1995 1995
DOI: 10.1190/1.1887527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavefield de‐aliasing for acquisition configurations leading to coarse sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impressive examples are shown in Wombell and Williams (1995) and Manin and Spitz (1995). Nevertheless, apart from low fold, another reason not to use more than two sources in modern MS/MS configurations is to prevent or limit multiple aliasing.…”
Section: Source Interval Number Of Sources and Foldmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Impressive examples are shown in Wombell and Williams (1995) and Manin and Spitz (1995). Nevertheless, apart from low fold, another reason not to use more than two sources in modern MS/MS configurations is to prevent or limit multiple aliasing.…”
Section: Source Interval Number Of Sources and Foldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Offset sampling in a CMP is 2 × source interval, so aliasing of multiples in midpoints (Section 3.4.3.2) is less likely to occur for single-source than for dual-source data. In particular, multiples with large differential moveout with respect to the primaries may be severely undersampled in the CMPs, even after NMO correction (Hobson et al, 1992;Manin and Spitz, 1995;Wombell and Williams, 1995;Hegna and Schoolmeesters, 2001;.…”
Section: Source Interval Number Of Sources and Foldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpolation of correctly sampled data is almost trivial, yet it is not so in the presence of aliasing. Methods of trace interpolation include sinc interpolation (Jakubowicz, 1994(Jakubowicz, , 1997 after alias reduction via NMO, most coherent dip interpolation (Larner et al, 1981), semblance weighted slant-stack interpolation (Lu, 1985), interpolation using event attributes (King et al, 1984), power diversity slant-stack interpolation (Monk et al, 1993), Radon domain trace interpolation for irregularly sampled or missing data (Kostov, 1989;Darche, 1990;Kabir and Verschuur, 1992;Schonewille and Duijndam, 1996), f -x prediction filter interpolation (Spitz, 1989(Spitz, , 1991Ji, 1993;Manin and Spitz, 1995;Porsani, 1999), f -x projection filter interpolation (Soubaras, 1997), t-x domain prediction error filter (PEF) interpolation (Claerbout and Nichols, 1991;Claerbout, 1992), and others combining different domains, such as f -x domain wavefield decomposition using a picked dip field (Pieprzak andMcClean, 1988, 1990). Trace interpolation methods that make use of the frequency-wavenumber ( f -k) domain have also emerged (Pan and Fields, 1986;Guo et al, 1996;Gülünay and Chambers, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%