2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2015.7131210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waveform design and receive processing for nonrecurrent nonlinear FMCW radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, of course, numerical imprecision and spectral roll-off issues prevent the optimized waveform from matching a Gaussian PSD exactly. However, in [5] range sidelobes below −70 dB were still achieved.…”
Section: Spectrally Shaped Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In practice, of course, numerical imprecision and spectral roll-off issues prevent the optimized waveform from matching a Gaussian PSD exactly. However, in [5] range sidelobes below −70 dB were still achieved.…”
Section: Spectrally Shaped Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The PRO-FMCW waveform [5] is produced from pseudorandom initializations and is spectrally shaped on a "segmentwise" basis to produce a favorable autocorrelation response. However, the direct approach realizes spectral gaps that are rectangular in shape and thus produce range sidelobes with a sin(x)/x shape.…”
Section: Spectrally Shaped Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that, in practice, perfectly orthogonal coded waveforms cannot be achieved and, therefore, waveforms with low cross-correlations should be used. The problem of waveform design with desirable low cross-correlation properties has been extensively investigated in the literature (see [26]- [28], and references therein). However, the problem of waveform design is out of the scope of this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%