2011
DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20110407-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavefront-optimized Surface Ablation With the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q Excimer Laser Platform: 12-month Visual and Refractive Results

Abstract: The wavefront-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser platform showed good efficacy, safety, and predictability in advanced surface ablation, with or without MMC intraoperative use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study done by Gambato C et al . [ 17 ] on patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism using wavefront-optimized Surface Ablation with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q Excimer Laser Platform over 12-month period showed that 94.7% (287/303) of eyes had postoperative UDVA equal or slightly better than pre op CDVA which is nearly the same for our results. Shortt AJ et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A study done by Gambato C et al . [ 17 ] on patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism using wavefront-optimized Surface Ablation with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q Excimer Laser Platform over 12-month period showed that 94.7% (287/303) of eyes had postoperative UDVA equal or slightly better than pre op CDVA which is nearly the same for our results. Shortt AJ et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Published series for SA using the A device showed comparable results to ours, even with older excimer laser versions (A device 200 Hz) [24, 29, 30]. However, slightly worse results in UDVA were found using the A device 400 Hz in other published series [26]. Isolated E device series showed results comparable to ours, with subtle differences among groups [25, 27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One year postoperatively, the mean MRSE (−0.02 D) was extraordinarily small, as well as the standard deviation (±0.15 D) of the same ( Table 4 ). Recent studies also showed a mean MRSE of −0.12 D ±0.35 D, 20 and −0.03 D ±0.15 D. 21 Also, 1 year after the procedure, nearly all patients (96%) in the Triple-A group had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better. This was not the case in the ASA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%