Imaging and Applied Optics 2013
DOI: 10.1364/aopt.2013.otu1a.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavefront Sensing by Phase and Modal Amplitude Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, represent a hard-edged vignetting surface. This capability was also observed by the simulations in [33].…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3, represent a hard-edged vignetting surface. This capability was also observed by the simulations in [33].…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The amplitude of the fixed pupil, A F , was allowed to vary in a pixel-by-pixel manner, as in classic TTDPR, to recover the fixed pupil effects of the additional hard-edged aperture. However, the resulting estimates for pupil amplitude were corrupted by salt-and-pepper noise to an unacceptable extent, as in [33]. We have found this failure mode to be typical of pixel-by-pixel amplitude retrieval involving a single plane very near focus, and other work has encountered similar challenges, as mentioned in Section 2.…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, aspheric optical elements are very difficult to test due to their different internal curvature radii. CGH is the commonly used null interferometry in interferometric testing [ 14 ], but it also faces several problems: the mode of one-to-one compensation measurement causes its poor measurement versatility, so the testing cost is high. For curved surface components with large gradients, CGH, as a compensator, needs to achieve the output of a large gradient wavefront through a diffraction structure with high density, so the groove density of CGH is limited by the current level of microstructure processing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%