2012
DOI: 10.1021/nn303756a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelength, Concentration, and Distance Dependence of Nonradiative Energy Transfer to a Plane of Gold Nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
178
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
178
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured quantum yield of the donor QD monolayer is 3%. 15,35 A correction term has been added to the dielectric permittivity of Au NPs to account for finite-size effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured quantum yield of the donor QD monolayer is 3%. 15,35 A correction term has been added to the dielectric permittivity of Au NPs to account for finite-size effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The distance dependence of the energy transfer from dyes or light-emitting colloidal quantum dots (QDs) to MNPs has been described using the NSET formalism for single emitter-metallic nanosphere pairs 13,14 and for planes of nanospheres. 15 LSP coupled FRET between donor-acceptor pairs has also been theoretically investigated. [16][17][18] Increases in the energy transfer rate, efficiency and range can be expected depending on the plasmonic properties of the MNP, and the relative positions of the donor and acceptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering, firstly, the effect of the Ag nanobox array on the QW emission, the reduction in PL lifetime and emission signifies a quenching process due to nonradiative energy transfer from the QW to the metal nanoparticles. Emission quenching by energy transfer to metal nanoparticles has been extensively reported by the literature [41][42][43]. This can be quantified as a quenching efficiency, Q E , which is given by Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) and (7) for the SE and ET rates of ensembles of emitters and donoracceptor pairs, we now define an ET efficiency η as [55] …”
Section: Energy Transfer Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%