2011
DOI: 10.1137/100786034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavenumber-Explicit $hp$-BEM for High Frequency Scattering

Abstract: For the Helmholtz equation (with wavenumber k) and analytic curves or surfaces Γ we analyze the Galerkin discretization of classical combined field integral equations in an L 2-setting. We give abstract conditions on the approximation properties of the ansatz space that ensure stability and quasi-optimality of the Galerkin method. Special attention is paid to the hp-version of the boundary element method (hp-BEM). Under the assumption of polynomial growth of the solution operator we show stability and quasi-op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This bound shows that the number of degrees of freedom only needs to grow slighter faster than k 1=9 in order to maintain accuracy as k ! 1; this is to be contrasted with the linear growth required in conventional boundary element methods in two dimensions as proved in [42]. Preliminary results on implementing the star-combined formulation show that this property is realized in practice [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This bound shows that the number of degrees of freedom only needs to grow slighter faster than k 1=9 in order to maintain accuracy as k ! 1; this is to be contrasted with the linear growth required in conventional boundary element methods in two dimensions as proved in [42]. Preliminary results on implementing the star-combined formulation show that this property is realized in practice [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"/, where N 0 . "/ depends only on ", and secondly that the polynomial degree is carefully chosen to depend logarithmically on k [42]. This result was obtained using a novel splitting of the operator A k;Á [45] motivated by a related numerical analysis for a domain-based (finite element) formulation [46].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its lack of sharpness, the bound (1.36) is sufficient for the following numerical analysis application: Löhndorf and Melenk have recently performed a kexplicit convergence analysis of the Galerkin method applied to the integral equation (1.25) using piecewise-polynomial subspaces (the so-called hp-boundary-element method) [31], [34]. An underlying assumption in this analysis is that, when |η| ∼ k,…”
Section: Conditioning Of Boundary Integral Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues are very well understood; see e.g. [9,10,37,30,12] and the many references therein.The problem of 'bridging the gap' between conventional numerical methods and fully asymptotic approaches has received a great deal of attention in recent years. Significant progress has been made in developing numerical methods which can achieve a prescribed level of accuracy at high frequencies with fewer degrees of freedom than conventional approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%