2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(06)70014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wc1c Development and Evaluation of the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult Version (Spi-A)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
204
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
204
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In both CHR individuals and controls, CHR criteria were assessed with the SOPS, 4 as well as the Diagnostic Interview of Personality Disorders, 21 and the 10 items from the Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms that were identified as having high predictive validity for the development of psychosis 6,7 and are implemented in the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult Version. 22 Inclusion criteria for the CHR individuals were age 13-35 and meeting diagnostic criteria as specified in table 1 (see online supplementary methods S1 for a detailed description of exclusion criteria). The study was approved by the local institutional review board committees at each institution, including Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both CHR individuals and controls, CHR criteria were assessed with the SOPS, 4 as well as the Diagnostic Interview of Personality Disorders, 21 and the 10 items from the Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms that were identified as having high predictive validity for the development of psychosis 6,7 and are implemented in the Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult Version. 22 Inclusion criteria for the CHR individuals were age 13-35 and meeting diagnostic criteria as specified in table 1 (see online supplementary methods S1 for a detailed description of exclusion criteria). The study was approved by the local institutional review board committees at each institution, including Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Moreover, the basic symptom criteria, COPER and COGDIS, are partially overlapping, but delineate risk of potentially different imminence and specificity-sensitivity ratio. [21][22][23][24] Nevertheless, both sets of at-risk criteria were developed solely 21 or predominately in adult samples (age 16 and older). 18 Therefore, early detection and treatment of people with first signs of the emerging disorder, which is currently regarded as one promising strategy in fighting the devastating consequences of psychosis, 1 may face different or additional challenges in children and adolescents, compared with adults.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between August 2002 and April 2006, data were collected from 245 help-seeking patients (age [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] who met Ôultra-high riskÕ (UHR) and ⁄ or Ôcognitive disturbancesÕ (COGDIS) criteria and agreed to participate in the European Prediction of Psychosis Study, EPOS (22,23). EPOS is a European collaboration of six centers in four countries: Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, and England.…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%