Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1368044.1368069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wcag 2.0

Abstract: Since the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG) became a W3C recommendation in May 1999, the Web has changed dramatically. This paper describes some of the major issues encountered because of these changes and the approaches developed to address them in WCAG 2.0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, note that all studies reported (except Pascual et al, 2014) were conducted before the release of WCAG 2.0 in 2008, being based on WCAG 1.0 as a reference standard. This time frame is important because WCAG 2.0 differs considerably from WCAG 1.0 (Reid & Snow-Weaver, 2008, 2009). Hence, research results based on WCAG 1.0 need to be treated with some caution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, note that all studies reported (except Pascual et al, 2014) were conducted before the release of WCAG 2.0 in 2008, being based on WCAG 1.0 as a reference standard. This time frame is important because WCAG 2.0 differs considerably from WCAG 1.0 (Reid & Snow-Weaver, 2008, 2009). Hence, research results based on WCAG 1.0 need to be treated with some caution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently WCAG is in version 2.0 and technological conditions to satisfy the accessibility requirement are not described, although it provides information about the known methods to develop application in accordance with the guidelines [18]. This document is complemented by a non-normative section, which describes specific details of how the technology should be used [11].…”
Section: Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accessibility is a theme widely explored in the academic literature. Authors such as Al-Khalifa (2010) makes an evaluation of e-government sites in Saudi Arabia based on the WCAG1 (Reid et al, 2008) accessibility requirements. In other examples, the authors Fagan & Fagan (2004), Goette et al (2006) and Lazar et al (2010) have worked on evaluations of government portals in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%