2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00264.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We Are a Religious People; 
We Are a Vengeful People

Abstract: We evaluate the relation between religiousness and vengeance using multiple indicators of religiousness (religious orientation and church variables) and behavioral as well as self-reports of vengeance. Results from hierarchical regression analyses revealed that intrinsic religious orientation was negatively and extrinsic religious orientation positively related to self-reports of revenge but not to behavioral indicators of revenge. Only quest orientation was related to behavioral indicators of revenge with tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Greer et al (2005) found that those high on a measure of nontraditional quest religiosity did not self-report as particularly "nonvengeful," but they actually had lower behavioral vengefulness retaliation. In a nearly identical result.…”
Section: Nonprosocial Effects: the Negative Influence Of Religious Prmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast, Greer et al (2005) found that those high on a measure of nontraditional quest religiosity did not self-report as particularly "nonvengeful," but they actually had lower behavioral vengefulness retaliation. In a nearly identical result.…”
Section: Nonprosocial Effects: the Negative Influence Of Religious Prmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…7 This type of effect rests on the assertion that social participation generates trust, a mechanism that is still debated (e.g.,Putnam, 2000;Claibourn and Martin, 2000; Uslaner, 2002; Sønderskov, in press).8 This kind of rhetoric has, e.g., been used by the Moral Majority in the U.S. -seeConrad (1983). Some religious people may even hold that without religion, there is no firm, credible basis for moral rules, indeed, that morality may not even exist, which implies that the non-religious, although not necessarily immoral, are more likely to not follow the true moral teachings than those who believe in a divine law-maker -seeGarcia and King (2008).9 See alsoEmerson and Smith (2000),Greer et al (2005) andPutnam and Campbell (2010). In the most serious cases, religiously based distrust can form a basis for terrorism and warfare against perceived enemies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…9 Indeed, Guiso et al (2003: 249) find that religious people are more intolerant of people of different background than themselves, compared to the non-religious, and that they hold a less equal view of women (cf. Emerson and Smith, 2000;Greer et al, 2005).…”
Section: A Negative Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%