2014
DOI: 10.3417/2012084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We are Still Learning About the Nature of Species and Their Evolutionary Relationships1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12, star) from the North Island and not with the remaining samples of C. obscurus. Such non-monophyletic relationships are not unusual in NZ plants (Lockhart et al 2001, Lockhart et al 2014. A larger phylogeographic study including both orchid species using molecular markers with greater variability would be required to test whether past hybrisation has occurred in NZ Corybas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12, star) from the North Island and not with the remaining samples of C. obscurus. Such non-monophyletic relationships are not unusual in NZ plants (Lockhart et al 2001, Lockhart et al 2014. A larger phylogeographic study including both orchid species using molecular markers with greater variability would be required to test whether past hybrisation has occurred in NZ Corybas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding point 1, informed by the findings of genomes and genetic data, our understanding of the nature of species has been changing ( Mallet 2007 ; Mavarez and Linares 2008 ; Dunn et al 2012 ; Abbott et al 2013 ; Becker et al 2013 ; Lockhart et al 2014 ; Muhlfeld et al 2014 ), and has become a much more complex concept than the standard mathematical idealization where one branch splits instantaneously into two. While genetic incompatibilities between populations might build up gradually over time and space ( Mallet 2005 ; Gourbiere and Mallet 2010 ; Abbott et al 2013 ), ecological and morphological diversification can be rapid (e.g., Doebley 2006 ; Linder 2008 ; Lamichhaney et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%