2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.042801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak percolation on multiplex networks

Abstract: Bootstrap percolation is a simple but nontrivial model. It has applications in many areas of science and has been explored on random networks for several decades. In single-layer (simplex) networks, it has been recently observed that bootstrap percolation, which is defined as an incremental process, can be seen as the opposite of pruning percolation, where nodes are removed according to a connectivity rule. Here we propose models of both bootstrap and pruning percolation for multiplex networks. We collectively… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of this phase transition is a clear sign that multilayer networks with interdependencies display a significant fragility with respect to random damage. Several other generalized percolation problems on multiplex networks have been also proposed, including competition between the layers [20,21], weak percolation [22,23], generalized k-core percolation [24], percolation on directed multiplex networks [25], spanning connectivity [26], and bond percolation [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nature of this phase transition is a clear sign that multilayer networks with interdependencies display a significant fragility with respect to random damage. Several other generalized percolation problems on multiplex networks have been also proposed, including competition between the layers [20,21], weak percolation [22,23], generalized k-core percolation [24], percolation on directed multiplex networks [25], spanning connectivity [26], and bond percolation [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it turns out that a message passing algorithm that admits an epidemic spreading interpretation [42,43], inspired by the algorithm originally proposed for multiplex network without link overlap, does not capture the MCGC [39][40][41], but instead characterizes a new type of directed percolation. This process can be interpreted as a variation of a bootstrap percolation dynamics [22,44] or as the viability percolation problem [40] in the limit in which the resource nodes are vanishing. Here we call this dynamical process directed percolation and its order parameter directed mutually connected giant component (DMCGC) to distinguish it from the MCGC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint degree distribution for uniform growth with β1 = 3 and β2 = 3. Theoretical result is presented in (17). Since the values decay fast in k and , we have depicted the logarithm of the inverse of this function, for a smoother output and better visibility.…”
Section: Model 2: Uniform Attachment In Two Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new theoretical measures enable studying various phenomena on top of multiplex networks analytically. Examples include epidemics [12,13], pathogen-awareness interplay [14,15], percolation processes [12,16,17], random walks [18,19], evolution of cooperation [20][21][22][23], diffusion processes [24] and social contagion [25]. For thorough reviews, see [23,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, undirected multiplex networks were explored [10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the present article, we study multiplex networks, in which all edges are directed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%