2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.102.052210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak tracking in nonautonomous chaotic systems

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the concept of P-tipping, for base states that are attracting limit cycles with regular basin boundaries, naturally extends to more complicated base states, such as quasiperiodic tori and chaotic attractors, and to irregular (e.g. fractal) basin boundaries [28,31,32,92]. Defining phase for more complicated cycles in higher dimensions, and for non-periodic oscillations, will usually require a different approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the concept of P-tipping, for base states that are attracting limit cycles with regular basin boundaries, naturally extends to more complicated base states, such as quasiperiodic tori and chaotic attractors, and to irregular (e.g. fractal) basin boundaries [28,31,32,92]. Defining phase for more complicated cycles in higher dimensions, and for non-periodic oscillations, will usually require a different approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to a parameter shift between two asymptotic values, one in the distant past and one in the distant future. Such systems, and their dependence on the rate of the parameter shift, have previously been investigated for shifts between equilibrium attractors [4,5] and periodic or more general attractors [1,2,16]. Rigorous results on the existence of such nonautonomous physical measures are presented in a companion paper [24].…”
Section: Tipping Points and Chaotic Multistabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each x 0 ∈ R d , τ ∈ R, and T > 0, define the empirical measure μ τ −T,τ,x0 as follows: for each Borel set S ∈ B(R d ), μ τ −T,τ,x0 (S) is the proportion of time t within the interval [τ − T, τ ] for which x(t) ∈ S, where x(•) is a solution of (1) with x(τ − T ) = x 0 . In other words 2 To be more precise, provided that the sets A(t) are Borel subsets of R d , we can naturally equip A with the σ-algebra {{x ∈ A : x(t) ∈ S} : S ∈ B(R d )} generated by the natural identification of A with A(t) by x → x(t); this σ-algebra does not depend on the time t. A probability measure μ can then be defined on this σ-algebra.…”
Section: Is the Perron-frobenius (Transfer) Operator Associated With The Map ϕ(T •)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For arbitrary time-dependent inputs, the theory of nonautonomous systems [56] summarises work in this area and gives general results on attraction and stability. Here, we focus on a case that is more specific, relevant to applications, and allows us to make further progress on the nonautonomous problem (3). In particular, it allows us to extend results from [9] to arbitrary dimension and to different cases of R-tipping.…”
Section: Asymptotically Constant Inputs: Future and Past Limit Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to denote a solution 3 to system (3) at time τ started from x 0 at initial time τ 0 for a fixed rate r. We also write trj [r]…”
Section: Solutions and Trajectories Of The Parametrised Nonautonomous...mentioning
confidence: 99%