2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5852-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly and Semi-supervised Deep Level Set Network for Automated Skin Lesion Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FCOS advances its detection prowess by extracting features and blending them via both up and down sampling, applying pixel-level analysis across different scales to adeptly detect objects of various sizes. FCOS sets itself apart from other networks with its unique 'center-ness' feature, which leads to a comprehensive, anchor-free and proposal-free detection solution [22] [23].…”
Section: Research On Yolov3 and Fcos Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCOS advances its detection prowess by extracting features and blending them via both up and down sampling, applying pixel-level analysis across different scales to adeptly detect objects of various sizes. FCOS sets itself apart from other networks with its unique 'center-ness' feature, which leads to a comprehensive, anchor-free and proposal-free detection solution [22] [23].…”
Section: Research On Yolov3 and Fcos Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which encourages ŷ1 il to be greater than ŷ0 i j plus margin. Similar to rank loss, narrowband suppression loss (Deng et al, 2020) also adds a constraint between hard-topredict pixels of background and lesion. Different from rank loss, narrowband suppression loss collects pixels in a narrowband along the ground-truth lesion boundary with radius r instead of all image pixels and then selects the top K pixels with the largest prediction errors.…”
Section: Rank Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for cancer cell detection often rely on subjective judgment and experience of physicians, leading to limitations such as time-consuming manual operations and susceptibility to subjective bias. However, with the advancement of deep learning technology, particularly in the field of object detection [1][2][3] [4], automated cancer cell detection methods based on deep learning are becoming an increasingly prominent trend [5] [6]. However, conventional object detectors cannot be applied directly to cancer cell detection due to various challenges, one of which arises from the limited inter-class variation observed between the malignant and the benign cancer cells [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%