2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3138451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wealth Taxation and Wealth Accumulation: Theory and Evidence from Denmark

Abstract: Using administrative wealth records from Denmark, we study the effects of wealth taxes on wealth accumulation. Denmark used to impose one of the world's highest marginal tax rates on wealth, but this tax was drastically reduced and ultimately abolished between 1989 and 1997. Due to the specific design of the wealth tax, these changes provide a compelling quasiexperiment for understanding behavioral responses among the wealthiest segments of the population. We find clear reduced-form effects of wealth taxes in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are robust to the inclusion of these components, see the robustness analysis in Section 4.2. The Danish wealth data have been used previously for research on wealth inequality (Boserup et al 2016), retirement savings (Chetty et al 2014a), impact of credit constraints (Leth-Petersen 2010; Kreiner et al 2019), effects of wealth taxation(Jakobsen et al 2018) and accuracy of survey responses(Browning and Leth-Petersen 2003;Kreiner et al 2015). Wealth inequality has been reasonably stable in Denmark over the 35-year observation period, with the top 10 percent richest owning between 50 and 80 percent of wealth depending on the definition of wealth and the sample considered(Boserup et al 2016;Jakobsen et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are robust to the inclusion of these components, see the robustness analysis in Section 4.2. The Danish wealth data have been used previously for research on wealth inequality (Boserup et al 2016), retirement savings (Chetty et al 2014a), impact of credit constraints (Leth-Petersen 2010; Kreiner et al 2019), effects of wealth taxation(Jakobsen et al 2018) and accuracy of survey responses(Browning and Leth-Petersen 2003;Kreiner et al 2015). Wealth inequality has been reasonably stable in Denmark over the 35-year observation period, with the top 10 percent richest owning between 50 and 80 percent of wealth depending on the definition of wealth and the sample considered(Boserup et al 2016;Jakobsen et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around half of total household wealth is owned by the top 10% wealthiest households, and around one-fifth of total household wealth is owned by the top 1% of households (Jakobsen et al 2018). A concentration of parental wealth homogamy at the top can be consequential for intergenerational wealth inequality, even if parental wealth homogamy is relatively low for the parental wealth distribution overall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wealth inequality has been fairly stable in Denmark over the last decades, except for slightly increasing wealth shares among the top 1% (Jakobsen et al 2018). On the other hand, with a correlation in wealth across generations of around 0.4, the intergenerational transmission of wealth in Denmark is low compared to the United States (Boserup et al 2013), which could reduce the preference for partners with high parental wealth.…”
Section: When To Measure Parental Wealth? a Methodological And Concepmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations