Wear and friction characterization of materials for hip prosthesis

Banchet, Vincent; Fridrici, V.; Abry, Jean‐Christophe; Kapsa, Ph.

doi:10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.085

Cited by 39 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…e prosthesis was lubricated by synovial fluid; thus friction coefficient of all contact pairs was set to be 0.08 according to the study by Banchet el al. [19].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Daily Activities and Position on Kinematics and Contact Mechanics of Dual Mobility Hip Implant

Gao

Zhao

Chen

et al. 2020

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dual mobility hip implants have been widely introduced to overcome dislocation in recent years. However, the potential influence of different gaits on kinematics and contact mechanics for dual mobility hip implants is still unclear. Furthermore, a large range of motion coupling with the implant position, especially high inclination or anteversion angle, may result in poor kinematics and contact mechanics. A previously developed dynamic finite element method was adopted in this study to examine the kinematics and corresponding stability of dual mobility hip implants under different gaits coupling with different inclinations or anteversion angles. The results showed only inner relative sliding under knee-bending for dual mobility hip implants under moderate inclination and anteversion angles, whereas an anteversion angle of 25° induced both impingement and consequent relative sliding of the outer articulation. However, the impingement (between the stem neck and the liner inner rim) indeed happened under stair-climbing and sitting-down/stand-up as well as combined movements when inclination and anteversion angles were set as 45° and 0°, respectively, and this finally led to relative sliding at the outer articulation. A high inclination angle did not worsen both the impingement and related outer sliding compared to modest inclination and anteversion angles of the liner, but a high anteversion angle prolonged the period of both the impingement and the outer relative sliding. The extreme motions and high anteversion angles are hardly inevitable, and they indeed lead to motions at both articulations for dual mobility hip implants.

show abstract

“…e prosthesis was lubricated by synovial fluid; thus friction coefficient of all contact pairs was set to be 0.08 according to the study by Banchet el al. [19].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Daily Activities and Position on Kinematics and Contact Mechanics of Dual Mobility Hip Implant

Gao

Zhao

Chen

et al. 2020

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, YSZ has already been suggested for applications in molten metal [40] and has proved some resistance to molten aluminum [41]. Although YSZ coating is not primarily used for tribological applications, the dense material exhibits a hardness of 1200-1280 HV [42,43] and has been proposed yet for specific wear problems [42,[44][45][46][47]. The friction behavior of zirconia against iron borides is unknown.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sliding Wear Behavior of Friction Couples Primarily Selected for Corrosion Resistance: Iron Boride/Iron Boride and Iron Boride/Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia

D’Ans

Debouverie

2018

Metals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wear mitigation in a sliding couple is challenging if wear has to be minimized on both surfaces. In this paper, ball-on-disk testing is performed on sliding couples where both surfaces (ball and disk) are treated for wear resistance. Studied materials are pack borided H13 tool steel (ASTM A681), pack borided AISI 420 stainless steel (ASTM A276) and plasma sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). Borided H13 steel exhibits a single phase Fe2B layer, while AISI 420 has a double phase layer, with FeB on the outer surface. Both FeB/Fe2B and FeB/YSZ couples generate three-body abrasion. In the latter case, mass transfer occurs from the ball to the disk as well. Friction coefficient is ~0.6 for the AISI 420/Fe2B and FeB/Fe2B sliding pairs, with less vibration on the latter and wear rates close to 10−3 mm³·(N·m)−1 for both the ball and the disk. In comparison, the FeB/YSZ pair has a friction coefficient of ~0.65, a similar total mass loss, but a much higher wear rate for YSZ than for FeB.

show abstract

“…1,2 However, aseptic loosening caused by longterm wear and dislocation are still two main problems which limit the clinical lifetime of artificial hip joints. 3,4 Among various techniques to prevent dislocation, the dual mobility hip implants first introduced by Gilles showed excellent clinical outcome to prevent dislocation and at the same time to allow a physiological range of motions. [5][6][7][8] Consequently, there is a growing interest in orthopedic communities to develop dual mobility hip implants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of friction and clearance on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implant

Gao

Chai

Wang

et al. 2015

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dual mobility hip implant has been introduced recently and increasingly used in total hip replacement to maintain the stability and reduce the risk of post-surgery dislocation. However, the kinematics and contact mechanisms of dual mobility hip implants have not been investigated in detail in the literature. Therefore, finite element method was adopted in this study to investigate dynamics and contact mechanics of a typical metal-on-polymer dual mobility hip implant under different friction coefficient ratios between the inner and the outer articulations and clearances/interferences between the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liner and the metal back shell. A critical ratio of friction coefficients between the two pairs of contact interfaces was found to mainly determine the rotating surfaces. Furthermore, an initial clearance between the liner and the back shell facilitated the rotation of the liner while an initial interference prevented such a motion at the outer articulating interface. In addition, the contact area and the sliding distance at the outer articulating surface were markedly greater than those at the inner cup-head interface, potentially leading to extensive wear at the outer surface of the liner.

show abstract

Wear and friction characterization of materials for hip prosthesis

Cited by 39 publications

References 6 publications

Effects of Daily Activities and Position on Kinematics and Contact Mechanics of Dual Mobility Hip Implant

Effects of Daily Activities and Position on Kinematics and Contact Mechanics of Dual Mobility Hip Implant

Sliding Wear Behavior of Friction Couples Primarily Selected for Corrosion Resistance: Iron Boride/Iron Boride and Iron Boride/Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia

Effect of friction and clearance on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About