2022
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear Behaviour of Polymer-Infiltrated Network Ceramics, Lithium Disilicate and Cubic Zirconia against Enamel in a Bruxism-Simulated Scenario

Abstract: The present study aimed to evaluate the wear rate of polymer-infiltrated network composites and ceramics against enamel in a bruxism-simulated scenario. Ninety-six (n = 96) molars were divided into six groups (n = 16) according to their occlusal material: group 1—a polymer-infiltrated network ceramic (PINC); group 2—a second polymer-infiltrated network ceramic (PINC2); group 3—nanohybrid resin-based composite (CO); group 4—cubic zirconia (ZR); group 5—lithium disilicate (LS); and group 6—sound enamel (EN). A l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asperities on the ceramic and enamel surfaces cause reciprocal abrasive scratching as suggested by Lawson NC (2016), 41 Baldi A et al (2022). 42 The mean of mean difference of enamel wear in group 1 was 0.62mm and standard deviation of 0.31. The mean of mean difference of enamel wear in group 2 teeth specimens was 0.32mm with standard deviation of 0.22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Asperities on the ceramic and enamel surfaces cause reciprocal abrasive scratching as suggested by Lawson NC (2016), 41 Baldi A et al (2022). 42 The mean of mean difference of enamel wear in group 1 was 0.62mm and standard deviation of 0.31. The mean of mean difference of enamel wear in group 2 teeth specimens was 0.32mm with standard deviation of 0.22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With novel PICNs created with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing, [25] restorations with sufficient strength, good internal compatibility and less opposing tooth wear can be made [26] as compared to existing ceramics [27,28]. It can be said that there has been a shift more towards polymer-based ceramics among newly developed aesthetic materials in dentistry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the RMCs are frequently used for several reasons. They are more flexible and less abrasive on a patient’s teeth [ 28 ]. They are not brittle and are easy to manipulate for intraoral repairs [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%