1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic for hip endoprostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Advances in the manufacture of ceramics for hip prostheses include the addition of zirconium and strontium to alumina and changes in the design of the femoral taper to allow a thicker ceramic head. [9][10][11][12][13] However, problems with the use of ceramics have emerged, such as squeaking and, more significantly, fracture of the prosthesis, 14,15 with the results of revision being poor. 15 Therefore, despite the incidence of ceramic fracture falling to between 0% and 0.004%, 16 the very large numbers of ceramic bearings and catastrophic consequences of suboptimal management justify a review of the options for the surgeon should a ceramic fracture occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Advances in the manufacture of ceramics for hip prostheses include the addition of zirconium and strontium to alumina and changes in the design of the femoral taper to allow a thicker ceramic head. [9][10][11][12][13] However, problems with the use of ceramics have emerged, such as squeaking and, more significantly, fracture of the prosthesis, 14,15 with the results of revision being poor. 15 Therefore, despite the incidence of ceramic fracture falling to between 0% and 0.004%, 16 the very large numbers of ceramic bearings and catastrophic consequences of suboptimal management justify a review of the options for the surgeon should a ceramic fracture occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to reduce the friction and wear between the acetabular cup and the femoral head. General approach is to reduce mechanical wear by selecting different bearing surfaces, such as ceramics on ceramics, 6 metal on metal, 7 or ceramics on metal. 8 Another approach is to improve the wear resistance of UHMWPE acetabular cup, which has shown to be improved significantly by cross-linking, 9,10 filler modification [11][12][13] and ion implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ist die Tribologie ausschlaggebend (z. B. bei Hüftkugel undpfanne) findet man bei artgleichen Paarungen nur noch CoCrMo-Legierungen; ansonsten werden Keramik-Keramik, Keramik-Polymer oder Metall-Polymer Paarungen mit Erfolg eingesetzt [7][8][9][10][11]. Obwohl die artgleiche Kombination von kubisch flächenzentrierten Werkstoffen unter Gleitverschleiß klassischen tribologischen Theorien widerspricht, zeigen sie in der klinischen Anwendung gute Ergebnisse.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified