2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear estimation of trapezoidal and circular shaped hip implants along with varying taper trunnion radiuses using finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to confirm that our model predictions were not significantly influenced by the mesh resolution, a mesh convergence study was performed 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to confirm that our model predictions were not significantly influenced by the mesh resolution, a mesh convergence study was performed 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In order to confirm that our model predictions were not significantly influenced by the mesh resolution, a mesh convergence study was performed. 31 For FE analysis, the results of the model were compared with the research data in previous studies to verify the validity. The number of comparative research data and types was closely related to the reliability of the completed FE model.…”
Section: Model Verification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crash analysis is carried out according to NCAP regulations and safety standards (Van Ratingen et al, 2016) (Afripin et al, 2019). Finite element analysis is carried out using Ansys 18.0 (Chethan & Ogulcan et al, 2020) . According to NCAP regulations, the bumper is made to crash into a rigid barrier [Figure 2] (in this case, a rigid wall).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of contact conditions were tested namely bonded (to simulate an extremely tight fitting of the implant with the femur), and frictional (to simulate a realistic standard fitting implant with the femur). The contacts were defined as flexible with a normal penalty stiffness factor of 1 with a penetration tolerance factor of 0.1 and based on the augmented Lagrangian method [39]. The contact surface was considered to have null initial penetration and surface offset.…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%