2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable sensor validation of sports-related movements for the lower extremity and trunk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used the root mean square error (RMSE) as the indicator to evaluate the prediction performance of each method as it is one of the most commonly used prediction performance indicators [88,89] and has been used as a standard statistical metric to measure model performance in meteorology, air quality, and climate researches [90][91][92]. Many sports outcome-prediction research used only RMSE as the prediction performance indicator [93][94][95]. Therefore, this research use RMSE as prediction performance indicator.…”
Section: Proposed Sports Outcome Prediction Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used the root mean square error (RMSE) as the indicator to evaluate the prediction performance of each method as it is one of the most commonly used prediction performance indicators [88,89] and has been used as a standard statistical metric to measure model performance in meteorology, air quality, and climate researches [90][91][92]. Many sports outcome-prediction research used only RMSE as the prediction performance indicator [93][94][95]. Therefore, this research use RMSE as prediction performance indicator.…”
Section: Proposed Sports Outcome Prediction Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each IMU consists of a tri-axial linear accelerometer, tri-axial rate gyroscopes that measure angular velocity, and a triaxial magnetometer to measure the orientation of the gyro [8]. The IMU is usually attached directly to the skin or via a Velcro or elastic strap or garment around the body segment [9,10]. IMUs have been incorporated into many wearable sensor systems in order to track joint kinematics during gait analysis, sports, and rehabilitation activities [9,11,12] because they have the advantage of being small, light, and easily attachable to different body segments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the IMU or marker is fastened directly to the skin, this vibration leads to a soft tissue motion artifact that degrades the kinematic recordings of what are meant to represent motions of the underlying bone [15,16]. Several authors have employed active or passive skin markers tracked by motion capture systems to evaluate the accuracy of measuring joint angles or joint angular velocities [10,13,17]. There have also been studies with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [18] and X-ray fluoroscopy measurements [15] of the kinematics of the underlying bone to remove the effect from soft tissue, but stereoradiography requires a static setup of the X-ray sources in the laboratory, is invasive and unethical for use on children or adolescents, and is completely impractical for use in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gait detection device is proposed for lower-extremity exoskeleton robots, which is integrated with a smart sensor in the shoes and has a compact structure and strong practicability (Zeng et al, 2021). With the development of camera technology, machine vision technology is also introduced into the field of human limb rehabilitation field (Gherman et al, 2019;Dahl et al, 2020;Mavor et al, 2020). However, most of the human limb function evaluation systems based on machine vision require a combination of cameras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%