2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearables data integration: Data-driven modeling to adjust for differences in Jawbone and Fitbit estimations of steps, calories, and resting heart-rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bland-Altman plots show the relationship between inter-device recording differences and are a common method of measurement comparison for continuous variables [ 21 , 22 ]. As shown in a past study comparing Jawbone and Fitbit fitness tracking devices, the Bland-Altman plots typically show the differences between devices over mean values [ 23 ]. Simple linear regression models were run in R, regressing the seat sensor resting rates on the reference Neulog resting rates, to calculate RMSE and R 2 values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bland-Altman plots show the relationship between inter-device recording differences and are a common method of measurement comparison for continuous variables [ 21 , 22 ]. As shown in a past study comparing Jawbone and Fitbit fitness tracking devices, the Bland-Altman plots typically show the differences between devices over mean values [ 23 ]. Simple linear regression models were run in R, regressing the seat sensor resting rates on the reference Neulog resting rates, to calculate RMSE and R 2 values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexible and wearable devices are concerned about the potential of personal health monitoring in a non-invasive, user-friendly, and cost-effective way [90][91][92]. Early efforts in the wearable device field were studied on physical activities such as steps, burned calories, or heart rhythms [93][94][95]. In recent years, the appearance of wearable devices has changed dramatically, and more and more researchers have shifted from tracking vital signs to focusing on healthcare applications, such as diabetes management or remote monitoring of elderly people [96][97][98].…”
Section: Flexible and Wearable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, worldwide wearable device vendors distributed a total of 125.5 million devices, which is an increase from the 104.3 million units distributed in 2016, making a 20.4% growth (Jia et al, 2018). The majority of research on wearable technology has focused on the accuracy and reliability of these devices (Nazari et al, 2017;Shah et al, 2017;Hernando et al, 2018) as well as promoting PA (Chiauzzi et al, 2015;Jo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%