2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web-based analysis of adherence to influenza vaccination among French healthcare workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Important differences in vaccination coverages were found by age and gender. In particular, older HCWs were less likely to accept vaccination, in contrast with findings of previous studies [ 33 ]. The main reasons for these findings can be found in less knowledge and poor confidence in vaccination.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Important differences in vaccination coverages were found by age and gender. In particular, older HCWs were less likely to accept vaccination, in contrast with findings of previous studies [ 33 ]. The main reasons for these findings can be found in less knowledge and poor confidence in vaccination.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, since it is well established that HCWs play a role in nosocomial transmission of infectious diseases, the low-level coverage of those susceptible did not contribute to limit the spread of infections and might not provide indirect protection for the patients. The findings of previous investigations showed a higher coverage for several vaccinations in different groups of HCWs compared to the results of this survey, with values of 41.7% [21] and 45.7% [22] for influenza in Slovenia and France, respectively; values of 93.7% and 80.5% were reported for diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella in Italy, respectively [12]; values of 88% and 72% were reported for diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis and pertussis in France, respectively [23]; and a value of 50.5% was reported for pertussis in Australia [24]. One possible explanation for the observed poor immunization coverage could be the lack of free on-site vaccines at work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Then, 52 studies (shown in Table 1) were selected for the systematic review. (Akan et al, 2016;Alsuhaibani, 2020;Awali et al, 2014;Bali et al, 2013;Banach et al, 2013;Bazán et al, 2017;Boey et al, 2018;Chor et al, 2011;DeSante et al, 2010;Douville et al, 2010;Durando et al, 2016;Feemster et al, 2011;Ghandora et al, 2019;Gianfredi et al, 2019;Goldstein et al, 2004;Hakim et al, 2011;Halpin & Reid, 2019;Haridi et al, 2017;Hubble et al, 2011;Hudu et al, 2016;Karageorgou et al, 2014;Kent et al, 2010;Kyaw et al, 2019;La Torre et al, 2017;LaVela et al, 2015;Leask et al, 2010;Lester et al, 2003;Looper et al, 2017;Maltezou et al, 2013;Maltezou, Gargalianos, et al, 2012;Maltezou, Lourida, et al, 2012;Maurer et al, 2012;Naleway et al, 2014;Nicolay et al, 2008;Pichon et al, 2019;Pless et al, 2017;Poland et al, 2008;Polgreen et al, 2010;Quintyne et al, 2018;Rebmann et al, 2012aRebmann et al, , 2012b…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reported a median of 5 in a scale with 1 as "not at all" and 10 as "absolutely yes" in agreement with mandatory vaccination with bimodal distribution towards the extreme scores (IQR 8). (Pichon et al, 2019) The other used a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) and described results stratified for vaccination status: median of 2 for vaccinated HCWs and of 4 for unvaccinated ones. (Shrikrishna et al, 2015)…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%