Web-based automation of green building rating index and life cycle cost analysis

Khan, Jam Shahzaib; Zakaria, Rozana; Aminuddin, Eeydzah; Abidin, Nur IzieAdiana; Sahamir, Shaza Rina; Ahmad, Rohanin; Abas, Darul Nafis

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/143/1/012062

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This assessment shows that 53.3% projects achieved certification and also indicates that the green building certification trend has room to improve by obtaining the interest of investors and builders to develop green buildings (MGBC 2016). Khan et al (2018) mentioned that in green building development, a higher initial cost are a major factor, therefore by providing various cost effective, efficient, easy and quick integrated methods of green building rating tools integrated with life cycle costing, elements can achieve more targets. The descent in the global financial market is affecting the property and real estate market globally (WGBT 2016) and investors might assume that the green building boom is near the end or on hold (Deng and Wu 2014).…”

Section: Current Adoption Of Green Buildings Globally and Specificallmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review

Khan

Zakaria

Shamsudin

et al. 2019

Administrative Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“Green Buildings” are essential in being responsive to the challenges of climate change and global warming while inhibiting natural resources degradation. This demand requires specific attention to increase the adoption of green-certified buildings within the construction industry. Innovative tools and techniques are needed to meet global challenges and strategies set for Sustainable Development Goals of 2030 agenda. This paper provides an intensive review of the evolution of green buildings from a sustainable development perspective which investigates the current global adoption of green buildings. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Selective Critical Literature Review Analysis (SCLRA) methodologies were adopted focusing on the content analysis to develop more in-depth knowledge. The scope of this study enlightens the sustainable development goals and initiatives. This paper highlighted that there is still inadequate adoption of green buildings and their rating tools on a significant basis in developing countries. This research adds a method towards the better understanding of green buildings and current scenarios that shall be considered for future research.

show abstract

Section: Current Adoption Of Green Buildings Globally and Specificallmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review

Khan

Zakaria

Shamsudin

et al. 2019

Administrative Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But due to global and local drives of green building development it started persuading green building in most of the countries around the world and countries started developing their own green building rating tools. Since, Malaysia also started embarking upon green building so there was need to assess green building Malaysia developed first developed green building rating tool in the year 2009 named as Green Building Index (GBI), then second was developed in 2012 named as Green PASS (Green Performance Assessment System) [24,25]. In the same year 2012 another GBRT was developed called as PHJKR (Skim Penilaian Penarafan Hijau JKR), and then it was followed by fourth called GreenRE (Green Real Estate) in 2013.…”

Section: Rise Of Green Building Rating Tools In Malaysiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results outlined that the management cost is found 87.7% as the highest, operation cost 3%, development cost 2%, both maintenance and construction and installation cost are found as 1.9% followed by contingencies / risk cost as 1.8% and last one replacement cost found as 1.7%. These results shows that the management cost will be highly associated at design stage of MyCREST due to the fact that the management cost is one the crucial cost element in construction projects [10,24,36]. The Following mathematical model equation 5 is developed and used as a resultant equation to calculate cost weighatge distribution of all seven life cycle cost elements; where x= ∑ FS of Sub-Criteria and Y is number of sub-criteria.…”

Section: Table 2 Mycrest (Design Stage) Criteria's and Sub-criteria mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, with the help of content analysis through literature review some of the prominent costing element have been identified and then considered as cost criteria's for green buildings. Various researchers mentioned that these costing elements have high influence on a project in general and are identified as seven most influencing cost elements: management cost, operation cost, maintenance cost, replacement cost, construction and installation cost, development cost, contingencies / risk cost [11][12][13][14][15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Embedded Life Cycle Costing Elements in Green Building Rating Tool

Khan¹,

Zakaria²,

Aminudin³

et al. 2019

Civ Eng J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green Building rating tools are the essential need of this era, to cope up with the sustainable development goals, climate change, and natural resource degradation through buildings. Realization of green building incentives decently increased within past few decades with abrupt declination in real estate markets and economic depletion has decelerated the interest of investors towards the green building projects. This research calculates influence of costing elements in MyCREST (IS-design) using questionnaire survey distributed amongst qualified professionals (QP’S) of green buildings and expert practitioners. Firstly, factor score and then weightage factor was performed to produce the final result with weightage output for evaluating weighatge and ranking of the relevant criteria of MyCREST and life cycle cost elements respectively. It is found that the criteria of storm water management has weighatge of 0.236 as highest and criteria environmental management plan (EMP) as 0.061 as lowest. Research also identified another perspective by finding association of cost element at design stage of MyCREST and found that management cost is highly associated at design stage with the value of 87.7%. The outcome of this research will add value to green building development and map road towards sustainable development using green building tools to uplift quality of life. Furthermore, this paves a way to integrate various stages of MyCREST with life cycle costing tool to potentially contribute in evaluating cost association through green building rating tool.

show abstract

“…Otros autores llevan a cabo el ACV y el análisis del coste del ciclo de vida (CCV), y, a partir de ambos, efectúan un estudio completo de la edificación. Recientemente, se están desarrollando diversas herramientas y webs con este enfoque de análisis económico y ambiental (Khan et al 2018; Sesana y Salvalai 2013; Vasquez Palacios y Quesada Molina 2017) destacando la importancia de su empleo en la fase de diseño para proyectar edificios más eficientes según el impacto económico y ambiental, y desmitificando el aumento de coste de un edificio más ecológico. Islam, Jollands y Setunge (2015), por ejemplo, realizan una revisión evaluando y comparando el ACV y CCV de edificios residenciales, para después aplicar dicho análisis a un caso en Australia.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Herramienta para la predicción de costes económicos y ambientales en el ciclo de vida de edificios residenciales. Fase de construcción

González-Vallejo

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este trabajo presenta una herramienta para predecir los impactos económicos y ambientales del ciclo de vida de edificios de tipo residencial en fase de diseño, partiendo de un proyecto arquitectónico, del presupuesto del proyecto, de las bases de costes de la construcción, en particular, las de Andalucía y del indicador huella ecológica. La herramienta propone alternativas en el uso de recursos (materiales, mano de obra y maquinaria) y sistemas constructivos, pudiendo formar parte en la toma de decisiones para mejorar el impacto del ciclo de vida del edificio. Se analiza un caso concreto de edificio residencial de diez plantas sobre rasante y se obtienen los recursos empleados y su impacto económico y ambiental a nivel global y de forma pormenorizada, según las fases del proyecto. Los materiales son el recurso de mayor importancia y, específicamente, el hormigón o el cerámico son los que producen mayor impacto. Se realiza un análisis de sensibilidad, en el que se proponen diferentes alternativas de materiales para una solución constructiva y se obtienen los datos para decidir la opción más viable económica y ambientalmente. La herramienta es de fácil manejo para el usuario y puede ser base para la certificación de edificios y el desarrollo de valores estándares a emplear en políticas gubernamentales. Palabras clave herramienta, ciclo de vida del edificio, impacto económico, impacto ambiental, huella ecológica, bases de costes de la construcción, edificios residenciales.

show abstract

Web-based automation of green building rating index and life cycle cost analysis

Cited by 10 publications

References 28 publications

Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review

Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review

Embedded Life Cycle Costing Elements in Green Building Rating Tool

Herramienta para la predicción de costes económicos y ambientales en el ciclo de vida de edificios residenciales. Fase de construcción

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About