2006
DOI: 10.3152/147154406781775922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web indicators for complex innovation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to state that the British network receive more links than other countries, perhaps, due to linguistic reasons (THELWALL, TANG & PRICE, 2003). Another possible explanation is the relative large size of the British network which therefore offers a large number of target pages for link (KATZ & COTHEY, 2006 Table 2 shows the universities with a high nOutDegree. Like the index before, this one measures the normalized degree of out-coming links.…”
Section: +Site:{university Domaina} +Linkdomain:{university Domainb}mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows us to state that the British network receive more links than other countries, perhaps, due to linguistic reasons (THELWALL, TANG & PRICE, 2003). Another possible explanation is the relative large size of the British network which therefore offers a large number of target pages for link (KATZ & COTHEY, 2006 Table 2 shows the universities with a high nOutDegree. Like the index before, this one measures the normalized degree of out-coming links.…”
Section: +Site:{university Domaina} +Linkdomain:{university Domainb}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the analysis of web graphs in terms of scale-free or small world networks has been incorporated into information science (BJÖRNEBORN, 2001(BJÖRNEBORN, , 2003KATZ & COTHEY, 2006;THELWALL & WILKINSON, 2003). Web graphs based on hyperlinks are only one example of such studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scaling correlation with an exponent α6 ¼1 is indicative of scale-invariant properties. When α>1.0 the correlation is superlinear indicative of a Matthew effect or cumulative advantage [32,78,91]. When α<1.0 the correlation is sublinear indicative of an inverse Matthew effect or cumulative disadvantage.…”
Section: Scaling Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of outlinks by a central group of websites that links a significant part of the network can be illustrated with the help of the Gini coefficient which measures the inequality of a distribution. It has previously been used to evaluate the web visibility of innovation systems (Katz & Cothey, 2006). The coefficient of 0 expresses total equality and a coefficient of 1 indicates maximal inequality.…”
Section: Data Analysis Structural Analysis: Comparing the In And Out Damentioning
confidence: 99%