2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28637-0_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Page Transformation When Switching Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al 2003;Milic-Frayling and Sommerer 2002;Rodden et al 2003;Wobbrock et al 2002;MacKay et al 2004;Xie et al 2005] preserve the visual context information of the original web pages. Baluja [2006] first displays a web page as a thumbnail image, which is divided into 9 regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al 2003;Milic-Frayling and Sommerer 2002;Rodden et al 2003;Wobbrock et al 2002;MacKay et al 2004;Xie et al 2005] preserve the visual context information of the original web pages. Baluja [2006] first displays a web page as a thumbnail image, which is divided into 9 regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WebThumb [Wobbrock et al 2002] provides a function to pick up and zoom into an item from the thumbnail view. Gateway [MacKay et al 2004] allows users to select blocks on a thumbnail overview of a page. These selected blocks are then expanded and superimposed on the overview.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can even confirm the full text to stay on page and this information is stored for future accesses (task personalization). As the hint detailed view loses format attributes useful on iconic systems, we are developing the next prototype generation with the Direct Migration [9] (no transformation applied to the page) inside the hint window with a lower opacity value to improve context view.…”
Section: Towards An Empirical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com); others looked for dynamic and automatic adaptations, but still focusing on the device [1,3,8]. These and other related approaches were well received, but the generated interfaces are different from the original in some aspects that complicate interaction with more than one device to perform the same task, especially when refinding and/or comparing information [7,9]. Many works addressed consistency and continuity problems focusing on user interface generation [4,5] and task migration [11], but their guidelines are generally not sufficiently concrete for an automatic interface framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others try to make dynamic adaptations according to each device [4]. However, recent researches found that many adapted interfaces for the same application lack in usability [5], [6]. The assumptions reside on the fact that, despite linear transformations use appropriately the smaller screen space, they tend to make bigger changes on the interface resulting in confusion while re-finding/comparing information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%