2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40692-015-0046-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web text reading: what satisfy both dyslexic and normal learners?

Abstract: The study employs an exploratory approach to examine the satisfaction of normal and dyslexic learners toward different web text modes. As an average of 10 % of the population shows some traits of dyslexia, presenting web text solely based on the guidelines for normal web users will put users with dyslexia at disadvantage. Due to the ubiquitous use of the web for online learning purposes and the availability of tremendous amount of text on the web, this investigation intends to derive appropriate guidelines for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas most of the existing Web readability guidelines focused either on dyslexia (e.g. 54,55 ) or typical readers 19 , researchers have recently advocated the need for inclusive recommendations that may benefit all users 59 . Our results support this approach and highlight several simple recommendations for webpage design that would facilitate reading for typical readers and readers with dyslexia alike.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas most of the existing Web readability guidelines focused either on dyslexia (e.g. 54,55 ) or typical readers 19 , researchers have recently advocated the need for inclusive recommendations that may benefit all users 59 . Our results support this approach and highlight several simple recommendations for webpage design that would facilitate reading for typical readers and readers with dyslexia alike.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is no need [to write] just sit down and start typing. When you [have] to write you have all the pressure of the exam and it doesn't come out well" (Chen, Keong, Teh, & Chuah, 2016;Makeham & Lee, 2012;Schneps, Thomson, Chen, Sonnert, & Pomplun, 2013;University of Oxford, 2017). Use of highlighter (not allowed)…”
Section: Extra Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a long-term plan, it is highly unlikely that examination boards will be able to prepare papers and examinations that meet the accessibility and usability needs of all individuals. Greater awareness and expertise of the special needs of different individuals would help in making examinations accessible to different types of learners and abilities (e.g., Chen, Keong, Teh, & Chuah, 2016;Edyburn, 2010;Maceri, 2003).…”
Section: The Emperor's New Clothes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pembelajaran pada peserta didik juga memerlukan suatu pekerjaan dalam kelompok sehingga dapat belajar dengan baik (Chen et al, 2016). Peserta didik juga memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan jawaban dari permasalahan dengan pembagian waktu yang spesifik (Bashir et al 2016).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified