2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weed growth and crop yield loss in wheat as influenced by row spacing and weed emergence times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Boström et al [5], doubling the row space from 120 mm to 240 mm, however, reduces grain yields in cereals by 12-16%. These findings are supported by Fahad et al [6], who stated that narrow row spacings lead to an increase in yield compared to wide row spacings. Moreover, narrowly seeded cereals can better suppress weed infestation compared to wider sowing [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to Boström et al [5], doubling the row space from 120 mm to 240 mm, however, reduces grain yields in cereals by 12-16%. These findings are supported by Fahad et al [6], who stated that narrow row spacings lead to an increase in yield compared to wide row spacings. Moreover, narrowly seeded cereals can better suppress weed infestation compared to wider sowing [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…High plant densities can accelerate canopy development and consequently weed suppression resulting in low competition between weed and maize for water and nutrients, which are vital for maize growth under semiarid or any environmental conditions. Additionally, physical plant attributes can lead to a viable competition against weeds, such as early canopy closure (Bajwa, Walsk, & Chauhan, 2017;Fahad et al, 2015;Weerarathne, Marambe, & Chauhan, 2017). Another interesting point is, according to the results observed, we can assume that economic and environmental trends could be solved because of reducing herbicides applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition to the climatic treatments, biological interactions may also affect the crop yield (see Gagic et al., ). Non‐crop plants are competitors for space and resources with the crop (Fahad et al., ). Sitobion avenae and Metopolophium dirhodum are aphid species feeding on the wheat, which may alter the yield (van Emden & Harrington, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%