2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(03)00024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weibull analysis of ceramics under high stress gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Size dependent strengthening of alumina from the macro-to the nanoscale, theoretical model and experimental data [10,[22][23][24]27]. The strength to thickness relation is described by different scaling laws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. Size dependent strengthening of alumina from the macro-to the nanoscale, theoretical model and experimental data [10,[22][23][24]27]. The strength to thickness relation is described by different scaling laws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. It is seen that the strength of ALD alumina is of the order of 3-5 GPa, which is 10 times higher than values for conventional bulk alumina, which are in the range of 250 MPa [10,23] to 600 MPa [10,24]. With decreasing coating thickness, the fracture strength of alumina strongly increases from 3.5 GPa at 100 nm to values of above 5 GPa for a thickness of 50 nm.…”
Section: Tensile Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new method developed by [7] allows to determine contact strength and fracture toughness with relatively small test pieces which can be machined out of bigger components. Experiments showed for a variety of materials, that the characteristic inert strength in bending and under contact loading are in good agreement, while the scatter in the strength distribution is wider under contact loading [8]. Unexpected, contact strength test at low loading rates did not reveal the typical subcritical crack growth effect, as it was observed in bending tests [9].…”
Section: Development and Assessment Of Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…2b versus the confidence intervals resulting from bending tests. It should be mentioned that the Weibull modulus m for contact strength is about half of that for bending strength [10,11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%