2021
DOI: 10.1515/fca-2021-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-Posedness for Weak and Strong Solutions of Non-Homogeneous Initial Boundary Value Problems for Fractional Diffusion Equations

Abstract: We study the well-posedness for initial boundary value problems associated with time fractional diffusion equations with non-homogenous boundary and initial values. We consider both weak and strong solutions for the problems. For weak solutions, we introduce a definition of solutions which allows to prove the existence of solution to the initial boundary value problems with non-zero initial and boundary values and non-homogeneous source terms lying in some negative-order Sobolev spaces. For strong solutions, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that the notion of weak solutions we propose may be strengthened by the spectral approach followed in [3,4]. Indeed, we prove that the weak solutions may be written by means of an explicit representation formula through expansions involving the Mittag-Leffler functions and the eigenvalues of the spatial operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that the notion of weak solutions we propose may be strengthened by the spectral approach followed in [3,4]. Indeed, we prove that the weak solutions may be written by means of an explicit representation formula through expansions involving the Mittag-Leffler functions and the eigenvalues of the spatial operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Formula (4) gives an explicit representation through expansions involving the Mittag-Leffler functions, the eigenvalues λ n and the eigenfunctions e n of the spatial operator. This representation formula is suggested by the spectral approach given in [3,4], where the authors deal with uniformly elliptic operators in a different setting. It is worthwhile to mention the paper [5] (see also references therein), where the authors give the representation of classical solutions by means of the α-resolvent family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we study the direct problem (1.1), especially the solution representation. One distinct feature of problem (1.1) is that it involves a nonzero Neumann boundary condition, which has not been extensively studied in the literature ( [25,37] for relevant works). Following [37], we exploit the one-dimensional nature of problem (1.1), and derive a series representation of the solution u.…”
Section: Well-posedness Of the Direct Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies and here we refer to In Gorenflo, Luchko and Yamamoto [6] and Kubica, Ryszewska and Yamamoto [15], Yamamoto [23], where one constructs the fractional derivative operator in Sobolev spaces based on L 2 (0, T ) and apply it to fractional differential equations including partial differential equations in spatial variables. Also see Kian [11], Kian and Yamamoto [12], Luchko and Yamamoto [18], Sakamoto and Yamamoto [21], Zacher [24]. The method in those works relies on the structure of Hilbert spaces, that is, p = 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%