2011
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Western Oregon Grass Seed Crop Rotation and Straw Residue Effects on Soil Quality

Abstract: Understanding the impact of crop rotation and residue management in grass seed production systems on soil quality and, in particular soil C dynamics, is critical in making long-term soil management decisions supporting farm sustainability. Th e eff ects of a 6-yr rotation and residue management (high vs. low residue) on soil quality were investigated at three locations in Oregon, each contrasting in soil drainage classifi cation. Th e crop rotations were continuous perennial grass seed production, grass/legume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(41 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, such fields sometimes posed challenges to trained personnel during drive-by, roadside collection of groundtruth data. Transitions needing correction matched some of the more common classification errors detected in the original 11-years of landuse data(Mueller-Warrant et al, 2011 and2015).The end products of corrections made to crops in the transition period into new grass seed stands in general duplicated cropping sequences already present at high frequency (data not shown). A total of 36 PR and 116 TF fields had to be omitted from further analysis because their cropping sequences were too ambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, such fields sometimes posed challenges to trained personnel during drive-by, roadside collection of groundtruth data. Transitions needing correction matched some of the more common classification errors detected in the original 11-years of landuse data(Mueller-Warrant et al, 2011 and2015).The end products of corrections made to crops in the transition period into new grass seed stands in general duplicated cropping sequences already present at high frequency (data not shown). A total of 36 PR and 116 TF fields had to be omitted from further analysis because their cropping sequences were too ambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This research was conducted over 25,303 km 2 of the Willamette River basin and nearby drainages in north-western Oregon and south-western Washington from 2004 to 2014 as previously described in detail (Mueller-Warrant et al, 2011, 2015, 2016a, and 2016b. Groundtruth data of crop kind and stand establishment phase were collected during drive-by, roadside surveys of 3000 to 7000 fields per year, simplified into 57 landuse categories representing ~99% of the area.…”
Section: Background Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Counts of allowed transitions between general category groups and each row's specific class, both from a specific class the previous year into a general class group and from a general class group the previous year into a specific class 2002a, 2002b, 2005Steiner et al 2006;Mueller-Warrant, Whittaker, and Young III 2008;Griffith et al 2011;Hoag et al 2012;. Strict landuse laws and regulations in Oregon governing both forest management and urban development served as the basis for prohibiting most transitions into new urban development or out of forest.…”
Section: Definition Of Permissible and Forbidden Year-to-year Transitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was advantageous for farmers as it was cheap and solved sanitary problems with diseases, pests and weeds, recycled mineral nutrients and supported autumn tillering of the grasses (Stamm, 1992). Due to air pollution, risk of traffic accidents (low visibility along fields) and a hazard of fires spreading to nature, this management is banned (Griffith et al, 2011). American farmers had to find another way of straw disposal and they bale it and offer for erosion control during grassing of slope areas (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%