1988
DOI: 10.1038/332245a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet and dry deposition of Chernobyl releases

Abstract: The passage of the Chernobyl plume over the United Kingdom in May 1986 led to the deposition of radionuclides on the ground by wet and dry deposition processes. Here we analyse rainfall during the passage of the plume and the published monitoring data obtained afterwards, and show that levels of deposited 137Cs can be closely related to rainfall intercepting the plume. 137Cs was present in the atmosphere mostly as particulate species with wet deposition mechanisms dominating. In contrast, 131I was present as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that wet deposition plays an important role in the formation of wide and heterogeneous high dose rate zones. It corresponds to the prior observational study on the Chernobyl nuclear accident considering that the geographic pattern of deposited 137 Cs was closely related to that of rainfall [40].…”
Section: Detailed Analysis On the Local Atmospheric Dispersion Processsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These results indicate that wet deposition plays an important role in the formation of wide and heterogeneous high dose rate zones. It corresponds to the prior observational study on the Chernobyl nuclear accident considering that the geographic pattern of deposited 137 Cs was closely related to that of rainfall [40].…”
Section: Detailed Analysis On the Local Atmospheric Dispersion Processsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Distinct local patterns of enhancement were formed which reflected air mass trajectories and the incidence of precipitation at the time that the Chernobyl atmospheric plume passed overhead (Clark and Smith, 1988). Our interpretation of the features observed lies within the framework of existing models of the interception of the Chernobyl plume of April-May 1986 by a series of discrete rainfall events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Smith and Clark (1989) provide a detailed description and analysis of the atmospheric debris (the Chernobyl plume) that crossed Britain a week after it was emitted and was repeatedly intercepted by rainfall events that resulted in selective wet-deposition. The majority of wet deposition occurred over two days (02 to 04 May 1986) and Clark and Smith (1988) provide maps of the rainfall that intercepted the plume and thus an estimate of total deposition that resulted from atmospheric washout. Our data compare favourably with these interpretations.…”
Section: The 137mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…deposition of radionuclides (Andronopoulos and Bartzis, 2010;de Sampaio et al, 2008;Lauritzen et al, 2007;Lutman et al, 2004;Terada and Chino, 2008;Leelossy et al, 2011). For this particular accident at Fukushima, the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model (Morino et al, 2011), the Lagrangian transport models HYSPLIT and FLEXPART with meteorological conditions provided by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (Srinivas et al, 2012), and the WRF-Chem tracer model which directly couples the simulation of the chemistry and meteorology (Huh et al, 2012(Huh et al, , 2013) have been used.…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%