2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.69.125421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting of TiC and TiN by metals

Abstract: A number of important issues raised by brazing technologies and recent wetting experiments with liquid metals on TiC and TiN are analyzed at the microscopic level, using first-principles density-functional computational experiments. The large variations of the wetting angles for Cu and Ag on TiC and TiN from experiment to experiment are connected of the relative contributions of different local atomic coordinations at the interface. The key factors in the structure dependence of Ag/Ti͑C,N͒ interface energetics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
67
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
13
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adhesion energy in the OO-terminated case turns out to be much larger than those in the O-and Si-terminated cases, and comparable to values previously computed for other metal-dielectric interfaces, such as Co/TiC (Ref. 21) and Nb/Al 2 O 3 (Ref. 22).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adhesion energy in the OO-terminated case turns out to be much larger than those in the O-and Si-terminated cases, and comparable to values previously computed for other metal-dielectric interfaces, such as Co/TiC (Ref. 21) and Nb/Al 2 O 3 (Ref. 22).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A first principles treatment would therefore be most appropriate for examining the nature of local bonding at an ideal interface between the two systems, and indeed this approach has proved insightful in the past for studying adhesion between metal films and insulating substrates. [21][22][23][24] Previous first-principles work on the α−quartz surface 20 observed significant changes in bonding near the surface; to our knowledge, however, the effects of metallic overlayers on SiO 2 surface geometries and electronic properties have yet to be examined from first principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calculated values are: E cleav = 9.81 (11.74) J/m 2 for the unrelaxed TiN (TiC) surface and E cleav = 9.17 (11.43) J/m 2 after relaxation of only the Ti-terminated side of the TiN (TiC) slab. These values should be compared with those for the nonpolar (001) surface, 2.76 (3.46) J/m 2 for TiN (TiC) [13]. Thus, for both TiX's, the polar (111) surface has a much lower stability than the (001) surface.…”
Section: B Surface Energetics and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ͑110͒ and ͑100͒ surface have only one configuration, which is terminated stoichiometrically by Ti and C. The calculated surface energies were listed in Table I and compared with experimental results and other DFT calculations. [22][23][24] As shown in Table I, among all the three TiC surfaces, the ͑100͒ surface has the lowest surface energy ͑1.68 J m −2 ͒.…”
Section: Atomistic Modeling Of the Anisotropic Strength Of Ticmentioning
confidence: 99%