2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2006.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weyl modules, Demazure modules, KR-modules, crystals, fusion products and limit constructions

Abstract: We study finite dimensional representations of current algebras, loop algebras and their quantized versions. For the current algebra of a simple Lie algebra of type ADE, we show that Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules and Weyl modules are in fact all Demazure modules. As a consequence one obtains an elementary proof of the dimension formula for Weyl modules for the current and the loop algebra. Further, we show that the crystals of the Weyl and the Demazure module are the same up to some additional label zero arrows… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
304
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
304
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to realize the crystal graph of the so called Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules KR(m, ω i , a), for i ∈ I, m ∈ Z + , we will define now the underlying combinatorial model in this paper, which we will denote by B m,i . For more details regarding KR-modules we refer to a series of papers ([Cha01], [CM06], [FL07]). …”
Section: Notation and Main Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to realize the crystal graph of the so called Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules KR(m, ω i , a), for i ∈ I, m ∈ Z + , we will define now the underlying combinatorial model in this paper, which we will denote by B m,i . For more details regarding KR-modules we refer to a series of papers ([Cha01], [CM06], [FL07]). …”
Section: Notation and Main Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modules are invariant with respect to the current algebra g ⊗ C[t] and provide a filtration on L by finite-dimensional spaces: [18,19]; some special cases are also contained in [12,23]). Let F m (N ) = D(N θ) ∩ F m be an intersection of the Demazure module with the m-th space of the PBW filtration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives a filtration on D(N θ). In order to describe the filtration F • (N ) we use a notion of the fusion product of g ⊗ C[t] modules (see [17,11]) and the Fourier-Littelmann results [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as conjectured in [5] (for simply laced g this had been proved previously in [4,9]). Both [26, Theorem A] and (2.4.2) were extended to the positive characteristic case in [2,10].…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…1 when g is simply laced [4,9]. Furtheremore, it was shown in [26] that, for any g, W (λ) admits a level-1 Demazure flag, i.e., a filtration whose subsequent quotients are isomorphic to Demazure modules of level 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%