2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WF2Q-M: Worst-case fair weighted fair queueing with maximum rate control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To meet the goal, we use the WF 2 Q-M scheduling algorithm -a weighted fair service discipline which provides both the upper and lower bounds of transmission rate guarantees [17] to assure the transmission bit rate range of all H.264 service levels are enforced.…”
Section: Scheduling With Wf 2 Q-mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the goal, we use the WF 2 Q-M scheduling algorithm -a weighted fair service discipline which provides both the upper and lower bounds of transmission rate guarantees [17] to assure the transmission bit rate range of all H.264 service levels are enforced.…”
Section: Scheduling With Wf 2 Q-mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as aforementioned, GPS is impractical because several packets from different traffic flows receive services simultaneously in GPS. On the contrary, in realistic networks a scheduler must complete or terminate the service of an entire packet from a flow before turning to the next flow [1], [7]. For this reason, many packet-based scheduling disciplines have been proposed to approximate the GPS scheduling mechanism in the open literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The well-known Generalized Processor Sharing (GPS) principle [19] and its variants have received tremendous research efforts (e.g., [4,5,10,11,18,21,23,[25][26][27][28]31, 32]) owing to the desirable properties including fairness, traffic isolation, and work conservation. In a GPS system, each traffic flow is assigned a weight that can guarantee a minimum service rate even though other traffic flows may be greedy in demanding service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%