“…Psycholinguists have used IC as a test case for studying the interplay of bottom--up and top--down processing in language comprehension (Featherstone & Sturt, 2010;Garnham, Traxler, Oakhill, & Gernsbacher, 1996;Greene & McKoon, 1995;Guerry, Gimenes, Caplan, & Rigalleau, 2006;Koornneef & Van Berkum, 2006;Long & De Ley, 2000;McDonald & MacWhinney, 1995;McKoon, Greene, & Ratcliff, 1993;Shen & Yang, 2006;Stewart, Pickering, & Sanford, 2000;) and the developmental origins of these processes (Pyykkonen, Matthews, & Jarvikivi, 2010). While some of these researchers have approached IC as an isolated phenomenon, others have addressed it as part of a broader theory of discourse coherence, treating it as a specific example of how the interpretation of one sentence is constrained by its relation to other sentences in the discourse (Frank, Koppen, Noordman, & Vonk, 2007;Kehler, Kertz, Rohde, & Elman, 2008;Crinean & Garnham, 2006;Ehrlich, 1980;Pickering & Majid, 2007;Stewart, Pickering, & Sanford, 1998). Other researchers have asked whether IC is an effect of language on thought or of thought on language (Brown & Fish, 1983a;Hoffman & Tchir, 1990) a la the Sapir--Whorf hypothesis (Whorf, 1956).…”