2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41666-020-00083-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Are People Concerned About During the Pandemic? Detecting Evolving Topics about COVID-19 from Twitter

Abstract: With the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affecting the lives of the citizens of over 200 countries, there is a need for policy makers and clinicians to understand public sentiment and track the spread of the disease. One of the sources for gaining valuable insight into public sentiment is through social media. This study aims to extract this insight by producing a list of the most discussed topics regarding COVID-19 on Twitter every week and monitoring the evolution of topics from week to week. This rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As news progressed about the vaccine production, social media outlets were used as a space to voice opinions about efficacy, equity, ethics, representation, and conspiracies surrounding this process [ 16 , 17 ]. Even before the pandemic, the anti-vaccination community has used social media to influence health decisions with their opinions about vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccines have not been an exception [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As news progressed about the vaccine production, social media outlets were used as a space to voice opinions about efficacy, equity, ethics, representation, and conspiracies surrounding this process [ 16 , 17 ]. Even before the pandemic, the anti-vaccination community has used social media to influence health decisions with their opinions about vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccines have not been an exception [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants are typically patients, caretakers, and health care professionals, who may form another layer of resistance to misinformation. Research has been active on popular social media platforms (eg, Twitter and Weibo) and COVID-19 [10][11][12][13][14][15]; however, there appears to be a gap in knowledge about how established, health-tailored communities have been responding to COVID-19. For these reasons, we will focus on a new COVID-19 community on MedHelp.org [16] for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xue et al [ 14 ] used latent Dirichlet allocation to identify popular unigrams and bigrams representative of salient topics and sentiments in the collected COVID-19 tweets, and they found that confirmed cases and death rates, preventive measures, health authorities and government policies, COVID-19 stigma, and negative psychological reactions (eg, fear) were the dominating topics on Twitter [ 14 ]. Chang et al [ 12 ] developed online non-negative matrix factorization algorithms to detect the evolving COVID-19 topics over time on Twitter; government policy, economic crisis, COVID-19-related updates and events, prevention, vaccines and treatments, and COVID-19 testing were some of the most important evolving topics identified. Zhao et al [ 15 ] explored the types of information most frequently searched by Chinese netizens during the pandemic on Weibo: accessing medical treatment, confirmatory testing, managing self-quarantine, and offline-to-online support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, user locational information enables researchers to investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of the public’s opinions and attitudes. In general, existing studies have investigated people’s reactions towards COVID-19 vaccines, with a heavy focus on the US [10-15] and also extends to other countries in the world, including China [16], South Africa [17], Australia [18], United Kingdom [19-20], Canada [21, 11], Africa [22] and to a global scale [23]. However, the study period of these works is relatively limited to or predominantly focused on the early stage of the pandemic or up to the end of 2020, without covering early 2021, the period of mass systemic vaccine implementation in many countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%